No one asked about the perennial live broadcast, and the sentence "I only complained about men who earned 3,000 in my live broadcast room" instantly caused a huge controversy. In the past, there was an "awakening sister" to let everyone "see the world", and the existing "3000 sisters" let everyone "look at the salary", but with the emergence of more information, we know that all this seems to be not simple, and we should really be vigilant.
On May 8th, a video about "women's live broadcast complaining about men with a monthly salary of 3000" quickly exploded on the Internet, and for a while, no matter how much the monthly salary is, people seem to feel offended, because in her remarks, it is suspected that there are some other points of view, and you must know that live broadcast is a public platform, and many things with distorted values cannot be exported, therefore, in response to this, many netizens have also reported it.
It is understood that the woman is from Shenmu, Shaanxi, and now, the police have also responded to this incident, making it clear that her value orientation is problematic, and she should not use some controversial topics to publish on public platforms, in addition, the police are also docking with the Cyberspace Administration of China. At present, it cannot be ruled out that the woman needs to be held responsible, because such behavior has actually had a certain impact on the social atmosphere.
Of course, because the police have paid attention to this matter, the woman's account has naturally been banned, and we don't know if she can continue to broadcast live in the future, but through her previous live broadcast style and some ideas, we know that it is a matter of time before she can get to this point, and everything is to blame.
Before the ban, many netizens also found a lot of information about the woman through clues, which she had published on the Internet. Of course, we don't know the authenticity, so we need to judge for ourselves this kind of thing. On January 17, it is suspected that the woman's personal account posted a selfie, and it was accompanied by a large amount of copywriting. From the copywriting, we know that the woman is a post-00s, only 24 years old, at this age, she has a car and a house, a monthly income of more than 10,000 yuan, and she also opened a studio as her own boss. In fact, seeing this, everything is normal, but after that, she began to make a comparison with men, and also called on women to do something. I have to say that the way of evaluating men first, and then appealing to women, is indeed a bit closer to the meaning of L. And it is worth noting that she also labeled a "185 handsome guy", which may be her criteria for choosing a mate, but at this time, she has not mentioned the other party's salary.
In fact, it can be seen from here that many of her words already have the meaning of "maliciously creating against L". And her usual live broadcast style is to make some views that lead to wrong value orientations, the purpose of doing this, to put it bluntly, is to want more people to know about herself, because she thinks that controversy is popular. And the content of the live broadcast is, to put it bluntly, "elevate women and belittle men", and doing so is a blatant provocation of the relationship between men and women, which must be illegal, therefore, she was banned, in fact, she is really not wronged, from the beginning of the live broadcast, she went to belittle and squeeze men to earn popularity. So now that it's banned, it's all self-inflicted.
In fact, she also explained this matter personally, for example, when she broadcast live, she said "She just looks down on men who come out to work and earn 3000 a month", but later she explained that she didn't say "look down", but "look down", she didn't target all men with a monthly salary of 3000, but only said that those "men with a monthly salary of 3000 want to pursue themselves" are what she can't look down on. It seems like a word difference, but in fact, it has two meanings.
Loading...
"Look at it" is actually "look down", which means that when choosing a mate, if the other party has a monthly salary of 3000, she will not choose it when choosing a mate. And looking down is a form of discrimination. Therefore, this is a matter of value orientation.
Of course, she actually explained why she said this, because a male netizen in the live broadcast room asked at that time, and she was emotional at the time, and this sentence was actually just said to the male netizen.
Loading...
In addition, she also said that if it is a man with a monthly salary of 3000, he cannot meet the needs of carrying a brand-name bag, and the woman made it clear that if it is 3000, when can I carry a brand-name bag? In fact, this is also a wrong idea, since you want to carry a brand-name bag, you can rely on your own efforts, why rely on others? You can have your own criteria for choosing a mate, but you can't openly target a certain group, and you can't do it, which shouldn't be.
In this regard, some netizens said:
Some netizens also said:
Some netizens said:
Now, the matter has ended, and the woman can be regarded as paying the price for herself, no matter what the purpose, this practice is not right, and I believe everyone can see that this kind of similar remarks and incidents have been frequent recently, which is indeed worth being vigilant against. Everyone has their own life, everyone has their own character and quality, good people and bad people have nothing to do with gender, we can't generalize.
Of course, because of this incident, the comment area of the local police also fell, and everyone asked how this matter would be handled. Because it is now more serious about the problem of the network environment, and this is the output of the wrong value orientation in public, therefore, the possibility of top-level punishment is not ruled out, but what will be done specifically needs to be analyzed according to the official notice and the specific problem, so it is not good to say anything.
Because the woman is not doing live broadcasts full-time, she usually works, during this period, some netizens are suspected of finding the company she joined, this company is a listed company, I don't know if this woman's remarks will affect the stock price and cause economic losses, but if it is really an employee of this company, it will most likely be affected. However, at present, everything is still uncertain, so many netizens have gone to the company's comment area to inquire and seek an answer.
In any case, this is the woman's personal behavior, and we should not implicate other people or other related things, so everyone should still be sensible, do not take this opportunity to express personal emotions, and put an end to cyberbullying. Of course, I also remind everyone not to output some incorrect views at will, because you can't get anything in this way, and even if you get it, in the end, it will be a waste of money, and the gains outweigh the losses.