If CCTV doesn't expose anything, once it is exposed, the school and the Education Bureau will begin to self-examine and apologize.
This is outrageous, so many questionnaires will be sent down by so many departments, why doesn't anyone think it's inappropriate? If you are serious, you can find the outrageous price and typos!
600 yuan of sneakers is to prevent comparison, this price is prohibitive for many adults, but it is used as a survey of primary school students, a pair of shoes 600 yuan, at least 4 pairs of shoes a year, how many students are there in a school?
This kind of questionnaire with huge fees, after so many departments and so many staff during this period, can it really reach the hands of parents?
As CCTV sent a number of questions, we can find that this matter does not seem to be as simple as it seems.
According to a report by CCTV on May 10, after the "600 yuan anti-climbing shoes" incident occurred in Huaibei, Anhui Province, a reporter from CCTV conducted an in-depth investigation into the matter.
Question 1: What is the purpose of the questionnaire?
After the incident fermented, the relevant departments responded, saying that this was just a proposal above, only used to collect data, and did not require parents to buy it, so it was a misunderstanding by parents.
Even if there are factors of misunderstanding among parents, are there also factors that schools and teachers have not explained clearly? If you just want a data, why is it 600 yuan? Is it that the local income has reached such a high level? Or is it not enough to have more than a hundred high-quality and inexpensive shoes?
Therefore, in response to the questions behind this questionnaire, CCTV reporters also interviewed the principal of the primary school, and the other party still emphasized that this is to collect data, and the school has no intention of buying sneakers.
The questionnaire was sent by the relevant departments of the Education Bureau, who then printed and distributed it.
Although the principal made it clear that she was only completing the task as required, I wonder if she saw a typo on the questionnaire?
"Students wearing the school is equipped with campus health sports shoes, which can eliminate the comparison of students"
What does "compare down" mean?
"Students' foot health can't be maintained close to liking and being equipped with healthy exercises"
In this short sentence, there are three mistakes, namely: foot health, only, and the word "shoe" is missing at the end.
It's hard to imagine how embarrassing parents would be when they saw such a typo questionnaire. Could it be that the school I send my children to every day can't even write a questionnaire?
Maybe parents don't have time to take a closer look, because everyone's focus is on "600 yuan a pair of shoes", after all, this price is staggering enough.
In response to this outrageous price, the principal also explained, saying that he was also surprised, but he wanted to just do an investigation, so he didn't delve into it, which Cheng wanted to cause such a big misunderstanding.
At the same time, the school also admitted that it was negligent in its work, neither explaining the background of the incident to the parents in detail, nor taking into account the comprehension ability of the younger students.
Therefore, as soon as the incident fermented, the school had already withdrawn all the questionnaires and explained them to the parents.
Question 2: Where does the price of 600 yuan come from?
According to the investigation, the questionnaire was circulated from the equipment section of the local education bureau, and the head of the department also explained it.
The theme of this survey is to hope that students can be equipped with healthy sports shoes like wearing school uniforms, and if everyone wears the same all over the body, then it will be able to reduce the psychology of comparison to a certain extent.
From this point of view, there is nothing wrong with it, but the key to the problem lies in this price.
The section chief also admitted that there were big mistakes in the process of promoting this research, specifically the following points:
1. Originally, the survey group was middle school students, but the staff made the wrong survey target and finally sent it to elementary schools.
2. In the survey, it was found that the average price of shoes worn by middle school students was about 600 yuan, but the staff moved this price directly to the questionnaire.
In response to all kinds of mistakes, the section chief expressed self-blame and apology, and the staff did not understand the materials enough, the work process was not careful, from the section staff to the section chief, they all had different degrees of work mistakes.
After the incident fermented, the local education bureau will also seriously investigate the relevant responsible persons, although the report did not say who is seriously responsible, but this "oolong" has caused such a big public opinion, presumably the equipment section chief is also panicked.
However, even though the relevant departments have explained, netizens still feel that this matter is outrageous:
"A pair of 600 shoes, the cost is about 30, the manufacturer can earn 20 yuan, how do you think the rest will be divided?"
"In fact, this is not the crux of the problem, the key is that in their opinion, 600 yuan shoes are not so expensive, and this kind of different perceptions generated by different social classes is the most terrible"
"Maybe in the eyes of the current school, parents are a piece of cake", "It is recommended to wear military liberation shoes, which can not only reflect patriotic feelings, but also help to practice military physical boxing, killing two birds with one stone"
"If something happens, it's a mistake at work, and if something doesn't happen, it may be successful, no matter how you say it, he's justified", "600 yuan anti-climbing shoes, which shows that the local economy is very high, and the consumption level is also very high"
"What is the purpose? Could it be to test everyone's reaction? "Was it a mistake or a dereliction of duty? ”
"Shoes for primary school students are about 60, what do you think about 600 yuan", "It is recommended to learn from the experience of Shenzhen, the Education Bureau only needs to stipulate the style, it doesn't matter where to buy, the shoes are uniform white"
"Fortunately, it was exposed, if it wasn't exposed, and it was really done like this, then I don't know how many parents would suffer"
"An education bureau actually has an equipment department? It's pretty impressive."
In fact, it is not terrible to have problems, but it is terrible to cover up problems, as long as you realize the mistakes and correct them, then it is worthy of praise.
In this case, how should we prevent students from comparing? In this regard, Professor Wang of a university in Anhui put forward a suggestion:
1. The local education department can formulate mandatory regulations, which can alleviate the generation of a comparative atmosphere;
2. The most fundamental thing is that students need to realize that this is a matter of incorrect values, and this requires the joint guidance of parents, schools and society.
If you want to reduce the psychology of comparison, the guidance of parents and teachers is indispensable, and only if your own values are correct, can you guide students, so that students can focus on learning.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message to discuss!