The woman complained about the monthly income of 3,000 men, causing controversy, and the intervention of network security was condemned by many netizens
Recently, a woman posted on social platforms, publicly complaining about men with a monthly income of 3,000 yuan, saying that they are "not worthy of falling in love". The move immediately sparked widespread controversy and condemnation, with many netizens believing that such discriminatory remarks were very inappropriate.
What's even more surprising is that the local cyber security department also intervened in the matter, which caused strong dissatisfaction among netizens. This incident has once again raised concerns about the issue of gender discrimination.
According to reports, a woman recently posted on social platforms and publicly complained about men with a monthly income of about 3,000 yuan.
In the post, she said that such men "do not deserve to be in love" and called them "a burden to society." She also said that such men "waste women's time" and should therefore stay away from the divorce market.
As soon as this post was issued, it aroused strong opposition and condemnation from many netizens. In their view, such discriminatory statements are inappropriate and completely contrary to the principle of gender equality. Someone bluntly said, "This is the superiority of women."
The involvement of the cyber security department in this matter caused public outrage, and surprisingly, the incident later attracted the attention of the local cyber security department. It is reported that the cyber security department has intervened in the investigation and also asked the relevant website to remove the posts involved.
This practice was immediately strongly criticized by the majority of netizens. They believe that it is problematic that cybersecurity authorities should intervene in such posts that are clearly sexist.
Some netizens said, "The cyber security department should take care of those real illegal acts, and should not interfere too much with the people's freedom of speech." Someone else bluntly said, "This practice is undoubtedly condoning gender discrimination, which is unacceptable".
Overall, this incident has once again raised widespread concern about the issue of gender discrimination. We hope that through the joint efforts of the whole society, we can further eliminate all forms of gender discrimination and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of everyone.