laitimes

also said the wrong thing, Xuan Jing resigned and 160,000 was just dismissed, Xuan Jing did something wrong

author:Blue Planet 456

Recently, Xuan Jing's inappropriate remarks have aroused heated discussions among netizens, and there are hot searches almost every day. On May 9, 2024, it was confirmed that Xuan Jing had left her job, and this is also the price that Xuan Jing paid for her words and actions.

also said the wrong thing, Xuan Jing resigned and 160,000 was just dismissed, Xuan Jing did something wrong

Many netizens couldn't help but feel a little emotional when they saw Xuan Jing's ending. Some netizens said that there are many similarities between what Xuan Jing and 160,000 did, but Xuan Jing's harm to the enterprise is far less than the harm of 160,000 to the company, and 160,000 is just dismissal. What is the reason for this result? Let's compare:

1. Speech

Jingjing: Why should management consider employees' families and feelings? Xuan Jing's remarks are more about corporate management, and they are also internal to the enterprise. There are many people who think that doing business is not to take too much into account the families and feelings of employees, and what enterprises want is results. Some netizens believe that enterprises should have warmth and care about employees' families and their own feelings, so that employees can be willing to contribute to the enterprise.

also said the wrong thing, Xuan Jing resigned and 160,000 was just dismissed, Xuan Jing did something wrong

160,000: said that fans are fan circle culture, held meetings for fans, dropped mobile phones, and deliberately exposed Dong Yuhui's salary. It can be said that 160,000 offended its direct consumers. And it also let netizens see the company's management level.

also said the wrong thing, Xuan Jing resigned and 160,000 was just dismissed, Xuan Jing did something wrong

In terms of the words and deeds of the two, it is reasonable that the quiet words are just a cognitive issue of management, and there has always been a debate, and there is no right or wrong. The words and deeds of 160,000 are obviously not management issues that can be discussed, but are clearly wrong or inappropriate.

Therefore, in this regard, 160,000 is significantly more harmful to the company than to Xuanjing.

Second, the behavioral aspect

Xuan Jing: was exposed to being a paper man in the office, suspected of venting anger at a media. Later, Xuanjing's apology was accused of being insincere.

also said the wrong thing, Xuan Jing resigned and 160,000 was just dismissed, Xuan Jing did something wrong

160,000: The executor of a series of actions such as slicing incidents, not allowing Dong Yuhui to be broadcast, and deliberately using Dong Yuhui's drainage, small composition incident, and de-glorification. And the apology after the small composition incident was accused of being insincere, and his expression was stiff.

also said the wrong thing, Xuan Jing resigned and 160,000 was just dismissed, Xuan Jing did something wrong

Therefore, from the perspective of behavior, Xuan Jing's behavior is purely personal behavior and has no material impact on the company. If there is no exposure, it will not have any impact on the company's image. However, the behavior of 160,000 directly affects the company's tens of millions of consumers and online presence. and directly injured Dong Yuhui, the hero who saved the company.

To sum up, no matter how you compare, the damage of 160,000 to the company is far greater than the damage to the company.

But why is there such a big difference in the endings of the two?

In fact, the key is the issue of cognition, which involves two cognitions, one is the cognition of the parties, and the other is the cognition of the founder who has the right to be dismissed.

Xuan Jing herself has realized that her series of actions have caused damage to the company's image, so Xuan Jing has the courage to take responsibility and voluntarily resign. Moreover, the fact that the founders of the company where Jing worked acquiesced to this practice shows that they are on the same page.

And 160,000 have always insisted that they are right, but they only apologize on the surface, but they don't actually feel that their words and deeds are wrong. And the founder of the company also thinks the same, but when the external demand is too high, he has to remove more than 160,000 CEO positions, but in fact, 160,000 are still managing the company.

Seeing this, we should understand what Xuan Jing did wrong? There is no question of what to say, the question is whether you have communicated well with the founder of the company in advance, and whether you have the support of the founder of the company, which is what matters.

If Xuan Jing has the support of the company's founder, then she will be removed from office at best. When the outside heat drops, it is enough to reappoint and remove a position. And now, Xuan Jing has to leave her job and leave her company.