laitimes

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

author:The man on the 5th floor

Chang'e-6 will be launched on May 3 and will enter a lunar orbit of 200 kilometers near the lunar point five days later, on May 8. Then turn on the thrust reverser engine on the probe, reduce the speed, and be captured by the moon's gravity, becoming a moon satellite.

After more than 20 days of exploration and adjustment, it will land on the far side of the moon to begin one of the most important missions of Chang'e-6, which is to conduct sampling missions.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

The plan of this sampling mission is to collect more than 2,000 grams of lunar soil samples on the surface of the moon, and if you still have an impression, you must be familiar with this number.

Yes, more than 3 years ago, the Chang'e-5 project was also 2,000 grams, but in the end, everyone knows that the final sample brought back to Earth was only 1,731 grams, which is about 13.45% less than the original plan.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

Why is there such a big error in the samples collected by Chang'e-5?

According to CCTV, it was Chang'e-6 that hit a rock under the moon when it was sampling, and the sampling time was limited at that time, only 19 hours.

If you continue to drill, the effect will not be too good, if you drill hard, there will be a certain risk, it was the continent's first lunar sampling, in order to be safe, it was decided not to drill, and finally returned to Earth with 1731 grams of samples.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

However, there is another way of saying that there is such a big error, and that is that it has a lot to do with the United States. The United States is the country that has landed on the moon the most, and has landed six manned people on the moon, obtaining 382 kilograms of lunar samples.

Therefore, at that time, the sampling of Chang'e-6 was based on the information published by the United States and the sample container was designed. However, the reality is that the density of lunar samples is somewhat smaller than the data published in the United States.

Therefore, when sampling, there was a certain error, resulting in the sampling of Chang'e-5 not reaching 2 kilograms, only 1731 grams.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

In fact, this is not the first time that U.S. lunar soil sample data has been misguided, as the Soviet Union conducted two sampling missions on the lunar surface before Chang'e-5 was unmanned.

However, the samples collected by the Soviet Union were very different from those of the United States, when "water" was detected in the lunar soil samples collected by the Soviet Union, but not in the American lunar soil samples.

At that time, there was also a debate that the Soviet Union believed that the American lunar soil samples were not real, while the United States believed that the Soviet lunar soil samples were "contaminated" with the Earth, and that when the samples were returned to the Earth to take out the samples, water vapor from the Earth entered the lunar soil samples due to poor sealing.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

Because the scientific and technological strength of the United States was in full swing at that time, the Soviets were a little less confident and eventually believed that their samples might have been contaminated, so the presence of water was detected in the lunar soil.

It is the trust in each lunar sample that for a long time, people thought that there was no water on the moon, until after the 21st century, with the progress of science and technology, the lunar orbiter probe is more advanced, and the existence of water was found on the moon, and the amount of water is quite a lot, as many as billions of tons.

After Chang'e-5 returned from lunar sampling in 2020, it also detected that the lunar soil samples did contain water, proving that there was no problem with the samples from the Soviet Union at that time.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

Since there is no problem with the Soviet sample, then the American sample is very boring, and it is also brought back from the moon, it is impossible for the gap to be so big, not to mention that the United States brought back 382 kg of samples, didn't all the moisture be detected?

In addition to the fact that no moisture has been detected in the lunar samples, there is also a problem, that is, there will be a "frosting phenomenon" on the moon, but the six moon landings in the United States have revealed a large number of images, but no frosting has been found.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

If Chang'e-6 has frosting again, then the Apollo moon landing is very suspicious

As mentioned earlier, one of the phenomena that will occur during the moon landing is the frosting phenomenon, which is also an important indicator to confirm the moon landing, and this phenomenon will occur as long as you land on the surface of the moon.

Frosting is easy to understand, generally in many foods in order to increase the taste, will be sprayed on the surface of the food a layer of frosting, the color and food have a large color difference. The frosting phenomenon on the surface of the moon is also reflected in the color difference.

Since the Moon is a planet with no geological activity, the surface of the Moon may not change for billions of years, and the dust covering the surface of the Moon will not change for a long time, so the color of the dust covering the surface of the Moon will be the same color.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

However, after the lunar soil is turned on the surface of the moon, the exposed fresh lunar soil will be darker in color, forming a noticeable color difference with the surrounding lunar soil, but the color of these fresh lunar soils will only begin to lighten after a few hours of exposure, which is the frosting phenomenon.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

However, in the photographs revealed during the Apollo moon landing, it can be seen that whether it was trampled, the moon wheel print, or the excavated lunar soil, its color is the same, and there is no obvious color difference.

However, starting from Chang'e-4 and after landing on the moon, whether it is the Yutu lunar rover or Chang'e-5 sampling, it can be clearly seen that the color difference between the two is very different in the turned over lunar soil.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

It is difficult to give a reasonable explanation for why there is a clear difference in color on one side and almost the same color on the other.

If Chang'e-6 once again frosts on the surface of the moon this time, then the Apollo moon landing program will prove to be very suspicious and suspicious.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

In addition, when the Apollo moon landing program returned to Earth, it did not use a waverider or Qian Xuesen's ballistic trajectory to reduce its speed before re-entering the atmosphere, and in fact, the United States has not mastered this technology until now. It enters the Earth directly at the second cosmic velocity, that is, at a speed of 11.2 km/s, with an overload of more than a dozen G's in the process.

The maximum overload that astronauts can generally withstand is 6-8 G, and some can reach 9 G, which is already very good, and it can be said that it is one in ten thousand. And an overload of one G is equivalent to a self of equal weight pressing on the body, and a dozen G's are equivalent to a dozen of themselves pressing on the body, and it is difficult for Apollo astronauts to survive such a large overload.

After the Chang'e-6 moon landing, if there is a "frosting phenomenon", will the Apollo moon landing be more suspicious?

However, from the Apollo return film and television materials, it can be seen that the Apollo astronauts climbed out of the return capsule very easily, and it was not at all like walking from the line of life and death. So, this is also a very suspicious place.

If the Apollo moon landing is really fake, I believe that it will not be able to hide it for long, because in 2030, the mainland will achieve a manned landing on the moon, and at that time, the United States may be returned to a "clean house".

#头条创作挑战赛#