A comparative analysis of the Theory and Practice of Regional Country Studies: An Exploration Based on Peking University and Regional Country Studies: History, Theory and Methodology
Author/Qiao Huimin
Trainees of the 13th Grand Diplomacy Youth Development and Practice Sailing Project Class
Studied at the School of Public Administration of Hubei University
Source: Grand Diplomacy Youth Think Tank (GDYT)
Editor's note: This article is a reflection on the study and practice of the 13th Grand Diplomacy Youth Development and Practice Navigation Project Class of the Grand Diplomacy Youth Think Tank (GDYT).
I. Introduction
As an interdisciplinary and comprehensive research field, regional and country studies has received increasing attention in mainland academia in recent years. As an important center of regional country studies in mainland China, Peking University has been committed to research and teaching in this field for many years, and has achieved fruitful results. In this paper, we will compare and analyze the differences in research perspectives, contents, and methods between the two books "Theory and Practice of Regional Country Studies: Exploration Based on Peking University" and "Regional Country Studies: History, Theory and Methodology", in order to provide a reference for us to deeply understand and grasp the academic context of regional country studies.
2. Brief description and characteristics of "Theory and Practice of Regional Country Studies: Exploration Based on Peking University".
The book "Theory and Practice of Regional and Country Studies: Exploration Based on Peking University" mainly describes the regional and country studies of Peking University and other well-known domestic universities from a practical perspective, and it elaborates on how to determine research topics, how to collect and analyze data, how to write high-quality academic papers and other practical skills. This book is a very useful guide for students and scholars who want to conduct regional country studies. In this article, the author introduces in detail the discipline construction and teaching methods of regional country studies. The author believes that regional and country studies are highly practical, and it is necessary to continuously explore suitable teaching methods and cultivate talents with an international perspective. At the same time, the article also mentions the exploration of theories in this discipline, such as the comparative study of different countries and the application of international relations theory.
(1) Research perspective
Based on Peking University's regional and country studies, this book focuses on the combination of theory and practice, emphasizing interdisciplinary research methods. This paper analyzes the similarities and differences between international relations and regional country studies, including an in-depth analysis of the theories of regional country studies and the analysis and consideration of empirical studies conducted in some specific countries or regions.
(2) Content structure
The book is divided into two parts, the first part focuses on theoretical exploration, covering the basic concepts, methodology, and discipline system construction of regional country studies, and the second part is practical, showing the practical application of regional country studies through case studies of countries around the mainland and important regions in the world.
The two articles refer to each other.
(3) Research methods
This book adopts a multidisciplinary research approach, combining multiple perspectives such as history, politics, economy, society, and culture, to conduct an in-depth analysis of regional and country studies. In the process of research, we pay attention to the mutual verification of empirical analysis and theoretical discussion to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of the research.
3. A brief description and characteristics of Regional and Country Studies: History, Theory and Methodology
The book "Regional and Country Studies: History, Theory and Methodology" focuses more on the study of theory and methodology. It provides a historical account of the evolution and development of regional country studies, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of various research methods. At the same time, the book also provides a wealth of case studies to help readers better understand the methods and practices of regional country studies. In this article, the author discusses the origin and development of regional country studies from a historical perspective. The author points out that the history of regional and country studies can be traced back to ancient geographical exploration and civilization studies, but it is not until modern times, with the acceleration of globalization and the increase of international exchanges, that the discipline has gradually become an independent discipline. The paper also introduces the research methods of the discipline, such as literature analysis, field investigation, data statistics, etc., and provides readers with practical research tools
(1) Research perspective
This book systematically reviews regional country studies from three dimensions: history, theory and methodology. The historical dimension focuses on the development of regional country studies, the theoretical dimension focuses on the academic system of regional country studies, and the methodological dimension discusses the specific methods of regional country studies.
(2) Content structure
The book is divided into three parts, the first part reviews the historical evolution of regional country studies, the second part analyzes the theoretical system of regional country studies, and the third part discusses the methods and applications of regional country studies.
(3) Research methods
This book uses a combination of literature review and case analysis to comprehensively review the history, theories and methods of regional country studies. In the research process, the continuity of history and the stage of development are emphasized, and the interconnection between theory and practice is emphasized, as well as the innovation and diversity of methods.
4. Comparative analysis of the two books
(1) Differences in research perspectives
Theory and Practice of Regional and Country Studies: An Exploration Based on Peking University focuses on the combination of theory and practice, emphasizing interdisciplinary research methods, while Regional and Country Studies: History, Theory and Methods systematically reviews the three dimensions of history, theory and methodology, emphasizing the comprehensiveness and depth of the research.
From a research perspective, Theory and Practice of Regional Country Studies: An Exploration Based on Peking University focuses more on exploring the issues of regional country studies from the perspectives of practical operation and case analysis. The book introduces in detail the practical experience of Peking University in regional and country studies, including the selection of research projects, the formation of research teams, and the application of research methods. This practice-oriented research perspective has given me a deeper understanding of the actual process of regional and country studies, and has also provided a valuable reference for my future research in the future.
In contrast, Regional Country Studies: History, Theory and Methods focuses more on the importance of regional country studies from the perspectives of historical development and theoretical construction. The book reviews the historical context of regional and country studies in detail, analyzes the research methods under different theoretical frameworks, and emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary cooperation in regional and country studies. This kind of research perspective, which focuses on history and theory, has enabled me to have a more comprehensive understanding of the academic background and theoretical support of regional country studies, and has also provided important theoretical support for me to deepen my understanding of regional country studies.
(2) Differences in content structure
The Theory and Practice of Regional and Country Studies: An Exploration Based on Peking University is divided into two parts, the first part discusses theory and the second part presents practice, while Regional Country Studies: History, Theory and Methods is divided into three parts, which review history, analyze theories, and discuss methods.
(3) Differences in research methods
Both books adopt a multidisciplinary approach, but Theory and Practice of Regional and Country Studies: An Exploration Based on Peking University focuses more on the mutual verification of empirical analysis and theoretical discussion, while Regional Country Studies: History, Theory and Methods emphasizes a research method that combines literature review and case analysis. In terms of methodology, the two books also have their own characteristics.
"Theory and Practice of Regional and Country Studies: An Exploration Based on Peking University" emphasizes the importance of empirical research and case analysis, and demonstrates the application of research methods and research results through specific cases. The methodological choices make the content of the book more realistic and convincing.
On the other hand, Regional Country Studies: History, Theory and Methods pays more attention to theoretical construction and logical reasoning, and expounds the theoretical framework and research methods of regional country studies through in-depth analysis and argumentation. The methodological choices make the content of the book more in-depth and comprehensive, as well as more academically valuable.
(4) Differences in theoretical construction
In terms of theoretical depth, Regional and Country Studies: History, Theory and Methods is clearly superior. The book not only provides an in-depth analysis of the history and theory of regional country studies, but also makes a forward-looking discussion on future development trends. This kind of in-depth theoretical analysis and forward-looking thinking has enabled me to have a deeper understanding of the academic value and practical significance of regional and country studies. On the other hand, "Theory and Practice of Regional and Country Studies: Exploration Based on Peking University" pays more attention to the summary and refinement of practical experience, although there are also theoretical discussions, but relatively speaking, it pays more attention to the application at the practical level.
V. Conclusions
In summary, the two books have certain differences in research perspectives, content structure, and research methods. These differences reflect the diversity and complexity of the field of regional country studies, and provide a wealth of academic resources for us to deeply understand and grasp this field. In future research, we can draw on the advantages of these two books to further broaden the research perspective, deepen the theoretical discussion, and innovate the research methods, so as to contribute to the development of the mainland regional country studies. In my opinion, both books provide very valuable insights and resources. By reading them, I not only gained a deeper understanding of regional country studies, but also sparked my interest in this field. In the process of comparative reading, I deeply felt the charm and value of regional country studies. Not only can it help us better understand the world, but it can also provide strong support for policymaking and international cooperation.
Specifically, I learned a lot about the history, theory, and methodology of regional country studies from these two books. For example, I learned about the evolution of regional country studies and the applicability of various research methods in different countries and regions. In addition, I learned practical skills such as how to identify research topics, how to collect and analyze data, and how to write high-quality academic papers. These knowledge and skills will have a positive impact on my future studies and work. For example, when choosing a research topic, I often feel lost and don't know which country or region to choose for in-depth research. In addition, I was also confused by some complex data analysis methods and did not know how to apply them to support my research. However, by consulting the relevant literature and consulting experts, I have gradually solved these problems.
Overall, the two books, Theory and Practice of Regional Country Studies: An Exploration Based on Peking University, and Regional Country Studies: History, Theory and Methodology, both provided a very good comparative reading and reflection, which not only gave me a deeper understanding of regional country studies, but also stimulated my interest in this field. I believe that this knowledge and experience will have a positive impact on my future studies and work.
disclaimer
The views expressed in the article are personal and do not necessarily represent the views of the platform