Before reading this article, please click "Follow", which is not only convenient for you to discuss and share, but also can bring you a different sense of participation, thank you for your support
On May 7, Beijing time, the CBA playoffs caused another sensation, and the Guangdong team defeated the Liaoning team with a victory, however, the referee's decision in the game caused a huge controversy.
First of all, Yan Jun, as one of the referees of this game, has become the focus of many controversies. In referee law enforcement, whether he favors the Liaoning team has become a hot topic among fans. Another referee, Kei Kei, was not spared, and their decision raised questions about the referee's impartiality.
Du Feng and Yang Ming became the two major coach representatives in this game. The technical foul penalties they received sparked speculation about the referee's double standard. Du Feng was punished for encouraging his players, while Yang Ming was not severely punished for his fierce protests against the referee, a inconsistent decision that raised questions about the uniformity of the referee's scale.
In terms of penalty kicks, the referee's decision also sparked heated discussions. Whether Guangdong's apparent display of greater aggression but the number of free throws they received far fewer than their opponents is a sign of the referee's bias towards Guangdong, is worth further discussion.
In addition, the conflict during the game further intensified the referee controversy. The interaction between Du Feng and Zhang Hao was regarded as a technical foul by the referee, and Yang Ming's fierce protest against the referee was not strictly punished.
Fairness and uniformity are the challenges that referees must face in the process of law enforcement. In this game, the referee's decision sparked questions and dissatisfaction among the fans. Perhaps, learn from the law enforcement experience of South Korean referee Lee Kyung-hwan. It can provide some inspiration for the referees of the Chinese CBA league to achieve a more fair and unified referee standard.
【Disclaimer】The process and pictures described in the article are all from the Internet, and this article aims to advocate positive social energy and no vulgar and other bad guidance. If it involves copyright or character infringement issues, please contact us in time, and we will delete the content as soon as possible!