laitimes

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

author:Binzai's daily life

I have to say that in recent years, this new energy vehicle has been enthusiastically sought after by the majority of netizens. While being popular, many netizens also questioned, is it true that new energy vehicles are safer than traditional fuel vehicles and are not easy to catch fire?

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

For everyone's questions, not long ago, the academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences said: In the first quarter of 2023, in terms of the comparison of the fire rate of fuel vehicles and new energy vehicles, the fire rate of fuel vehicles is 0.58 per 10,000 and 0.44 per 10,000 of new energy vehicles, so the fire rate of fuel vehicles is higher than that of new energy vehicles!

Loading...

The fact that an academician of a country is a top figure in a certain field in this country makes such a stupid conclusion shows the level of scientific and technological personnel in this country!

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

According to national statistics, as of this year, 100% of the post-80s are over 30 years old, 40% of the post-90s are over 30 years old, and no one after the 00s has lived past the age of 30

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

This academician also spelled for the battery car [covering his face] [covering his face] [covering his face]

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

There are more than one billion fuel vehicles in China, and the new energy is estimated to be less than 100 million

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy
Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

It's like the expert who said that China's food safety is 99%

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

However, he did not tell everyone that the actual ratio of fuel vehicles to new energy vehicles in China is 10:1, and in the case of this ratio, the current fire rate of fuel vehicles is higher than that of new energy vehicles

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

Seeing this, I understand why it is normal for so many academicians in China not to win the Nobel Prize.

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy

Write at the end

I don't know much about cars, I don't know if the experts are right [picking my nose]

But I think people are experts after all, maybe they have come to this result after a long period of calculation?

And I wonder what kind of car this specialist himself drives?

Do you think the experts are right?

Experts said that the fire rate of fuel vehicles was higher than that of new energy vehicles, and netizens in the comment area were noisy