The content of this article is based on authoritative historical data, and there are citations at the end of the article.
In 1992, in Sarajevo, a city that once lived in harmony with its multiculturalism and religion, the footsteps of war were heard approaching.
On 3 March, Bosnia and Herzegovina declared its independence, and the news shocked Europe like a bombshell on a quiet spring morning. Serbian nationalists, unable to accept this upheaval, almost immediately proclaimed the establishment of the Bosnian Serbian Republic in Bosnia. In this way, a long-planned crisis was triggered, and the Bosnian skies began to fill with smoke and fire.
Bosnian independence and the outbreak of war
The civil war in Yugoslavia, especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina, shows how nationalist sentiments can be manipulated and intensified to a blazing heat. The outbreak of this war can be traced back to the political tactics of the Serbian leadership and the deliberate incitement of nationalist sentiments. Under the leadership of Milosevic and Karadzic, among others, an extreme nationalist sentiment was pushed to the fore as a tool for them to consolidate their political position.
On 3 March 1992, Bosnia and Herzegovina declared independence, a move that drew widespread attention and fierce reactions at home and abroad. Bosnia's declaration of independence almost immediately provoked a backlash from Serbian nationalists. With Serbia's support, Serbs in Bosnia moved swiftly to proclaim the Bosnian Serbian Republic, a newly formed entity that included a number of Serbian autonomous regions in Bosnia.
The proclamation of this new republic was almost a direct challenge to the Bosnian central government, aimed at protecting the interests of the Serbs and preventing the rule of the Bosnian central government. The Serb leaders claim that Bosnia's decision on independence did not fully take into account the will and security of the Serbs, and therefore they need their own protections.
Shortly after the proclamation of the Bosnian Serbian Republic, the situation in Bosnia deteriorated rapidly. The Serbs have tightened their grip on their newly declared territories, while there have been numerous clashes between Bosnian government forces and Serb armed forces along the border. These conflicts quickly turned into full-scale wars, and tensions in Bosnia reached unprecedented heights.
By April, the war was in full swing and the conflict in Bosnia became extremely intense. The fighting has been concentrated in and around the Bosnian government-controlled multi-ethnic cities, including the capital, Sarajevo. The Serb armed forces are trying to cut off the supply lines of these cities by military means in order to force them to surrender or to paralyze their defenses. Bosnian government forces and local militias organized to resist, forming a series of front-line and defensive positions.
At this time, the position of the Croats was more complicated. On the one hand, they supported the territorial integrity of Bosnia and the fight against Serbian aggression; This further complicated the situation in the Bosnian War, with the Croat-Muslim alliance sometimes solidifying and at other times rifting due to different strategic and political objectives.
As the war dragged on, the entire territory of Bosnia became a battlefield, and fighting between the three major ethnic groups was pervasive and ever-present.
Major events during the war
In March 1994, a busy market in the centre of Sarajevo was fatally attacked by Serbian forces, with a sudden mortar bombardment resulting in the deaths of 67 innocent civilians and the wounding of dozens more. The attack caused a great international shock as it was directly targeted at civilian areas, and was widely condemned as a war crime.
The market was bustling with people buying food and necessities in the makeshift bazaar, trying to make ends meet despite the shadow of war hanging over the city. Suddenly, the sound of shells in the air rang out, followed by explosions and the screams that followed. Amid the smoke and dust, the streets were littered with the remains of people and the cries of the wounded, and the stalls of the market were reduced to rubble.
Sarajevo has been under a tight siege by the Serbian armed forces since the outbreak of the war. The city, once a symbol of multi-ethnic coexistence, has been destroyed by war and blockade. Serb snipers are stationed in high-rise buildings and shoot at any citizens who show their faces, making everyday life in the city extremely dangerous. The city's water and electricity facilities are often damaged, food and medical supplies are in short supply, and citizens live in constant fear and deprivation.
In this state of siege, the city's healthcare system is also facing serious challenges. Hospitals and emergency stations are constantly receiving wounded from the front line and from urban areas. The wounded and sick are overcrowded, and medical personnel have to work in extreme conditions, often lacking adequate medicines and medical equipment.
In addition, due to the strategic importance of Sarajevo's geographical location, the Serbian army intended to force the Bosnian government to surrender or compromise through continuous shelling and sniper operations. However, this prolonged siege and sniping not only failed to crush the city's will to resist, but aroused strong resentment among the residents and sympathy and support from the international community.
The international community has shown growing concern about Sarajevo's plight, and many countries have begun to condemn the actions of the Serb army. As the international news media reported on such attacks against civilians, global perceptions of the war in Bosnia began to change, and calls for international intervention grew louder.
Srebrenica massacre
In July 1995, the small town of Srebrenica in eastern Bosnia became the focus of international attention. The area has been designated a "safe zone" by the United Nations and is supposed to be protected by the international community, with Dutch peacekeepers stationed there to maintain order and protect local Muslim civilians. However, the region's security commitments are extremely fragile in the face of the harsh realities of the Bosnian war.
When Serb forces surrounded Srebrenica, they first launched a threatening and forceful display against the Dutch peacekeepers. Peacekeepers are at a significant disadvantage compared to their counterparts in terms of personnel and weaponry, lack adequate support and logistical supplies, and are eventually forced to surrender their weapons under heavy pressure, effectively losing the ability to carry out peacekeeping missions. This action quickly led to the collapse of Srebrenica's defenses, and Serb troops then moved into the center of the town.
With the entry of Serb troops, the situation in Srebrenica deteriorated rapidly. Tens of thousands of Muslim civilians tried to flee or seek refuge, but most failed to escape. Serb forces began to systematically separate men from women and children, and hundreds of men and teenagers were taken to concentration sites, which soon became sites for mass executions. In the process, many were summarily shot without trial.
In addition, many civilians were intercepted and killed by Serb forces while trying to flee the town centre. As reports of these events began to spread, the international community was shocked and outraged by this apparent act of ethnic cleansing. These acts not only violate international law, but also pose a serious challenge to human morality.
In the aftermath of the massacre, the Serb army also tried to cover up the crime. They moved the bodies of the victims in an attempt to hide the evidence with mass cemeteries. However, as time went on and more evidence emerged, the ICC began to investigate these acts and eventually characterized them as war crimes and ethnic cleansing.
Signing of the Dayton Peace Accords
In December 1995, the years-long Bosnian war finally saw the dawn of peace. Under the mediation of the United States, three key leaders – President Slobodan Milosevic of Serbia, President Tudjman of Croatia, and President Izetbegovic of Bosnia – gathered in Dayton, Ohio, to sign the historic Dayton Peace Accords. This agreement marked the official end of the Bosnian War and laid the groundwork for the future political structure of the region.
The signing ceremony of the Dayton Peace Accords took place in a carefully selected conference room at a U.S. Air Force base. The thoughtful arrangements ensured the safety of the leaders attending the meeting, and at the same time symbolized the high level of attention and expectation of the outside world for this peace effort. The signing ceremony was not a simple meeting, but the result of weeks of intensive negotiations and international mediation, involving complex political, military and geopolitical issues.
Under the Dayton Peace Agreement, Bosnia and Herzegovina was divided into two main political entities: the Bosnian Republika Srpska and the Bosnia-Croatian Federation. This arrangement is designed to balance the interests of the main ethnic groups in the country — Muslims, Serbs and Croats — with their respective political representation and autonomy. The agreement also includes strict regional demarcation, equal rights for ethnic groups, and provisions for the return and reconstruction of their homes, which are key elements in ending the long-standing conflict.
The signing of the agreement was not a unilateral expedient measure, but the result of a long period of careful consideration and pressure from the international community. In the negotiation process, each party needs to make certain concessions while safeguarding its own national interests. The process is fraught with challenges and tensions, and every step of the negotiations could affect the stability and reconstruction of post-war Bosnia.
In addition, the Dayton Peace Accords established a framework for co-governance, namely, a presidential corps of Bosnia and Herzegovina, composed of representatives of the three communities. The purpose of this innovative body is to ensure that the interests and voices of the major ethnic groups are taken into account and expressed equally in the national decision-making process. This is a fundamental reform of the previous model of mono-ethnic dominance, aiming to reduce inter-ethnic tensions and contradictions through co-governance.
The implementation of the agreement has not been without its challenges. In the years since it was signed, the international community and the Bosnian authorities have worked hard to implement the terms of the agreement, despite the difficulties and challenges, including accountability for war crimes, post-war reconstruction and the return of displaced persons.
Civil War in Bosnia and Herzegovina and New Nationalism in the Nineties[J].Journal of China Youth University of Political Science,1995,14(2):66-69