Recently, an e-commerce company posted on the Internet that 80 students from a technical school in Yinchuan, Ningxia bought the same performance costume in their own store, which is a big order in the eyes of merchants. Unexpectedly, within a few days, this batch of clothes was returned one after another, and then the merchant reacted, it turned out that this was a "trap".
According to the report of Chao News, after the students used the costumes, they were returned in large numbers on the grounds of "seven days no reason to return", and the tag of each piece of clothing was not removed, and the merchant did not agree to return the order and received a bad review, so it can be inferred that this is a typical "white prostitution" behavior, so is it wrong for parents to make reasonable use of "seven days no reason to return"?
"Seven days no reason to return" is a kind of consumer protection for consumers by the platform and merchants, and after consumers receive the goods, they can return the goods regardless of the reason they are not satisfied with the goods. But I didn't expect that now some people are taking advantage of this "loophole" to provide convenience for themselves, and even save money on renting costumes, some people think this is wisdom, but some people think that this is with the help of the rules of the platform, destroying the trust between people.
After the incident fermented on the Internet, the school responded that this was a spontaneous act of the students, and now the students' return behavior has been stopped, and the returned performance costumes will be repurchased to reduce the losses of the merchants. It can be seen from this that the school has handled it very appropriately, showing the fundamentals of teaching and educating people, but has the school not thought about a problem? Is your sentence a "holy decree" for teachers, and a word of a teacher also a "holy decree" for parents?
In the interview, the school said very clearly, we just informed the class students to prepare their own programs, did not put forward special requirements for clothing, and was generous and beautiful, but the teacher dared to be lazy? The school threw the "pot" to the teacher, and the teacher threw the "pot" to the parents, and the parents had no choice but to take advantage of the "seven-day no reason to return" loophole, and finally let the business bear the loss, does it really have nothing to do with the school? Or at the beginning, the school required everyone to wear school uniforms to perform, will there still be this problem?
As a parent, Dad's father also talked about his personal feelings. Starting from the child's kindergarten, every year during the Spring Festival, Children's Day, Halloween, Spring Outing, etc., as long as it is a program that is related to the activity performance, the teachers of each class will ask parents to buy costumes for rehearsal performances. This is especially true after elementary school, sports days, flag raising, social gatherings, group activities, and even the tablecloth has to be ordered in a different color every semester. The tasks assigned by the school, the teachers just want to try their best to cooperate, so that the school can see how much they value, and these different costumes can indeed reflect the difference and special of each class, but which time is not paid for by the parents?
I believe that people with children can understand that these costumes look glamorous, but which clothes can be worn in daily life? The author boldly guesses that if those performance clothes that have been returned on a large scale are replaced with sweatshirts and short sleeves worn by children every day, most parents will not choose to return them. But because they have to buy different, disposable, and unwearable items for each performance, parents will use this way of returning goods to relieve pressure.
So the school said that this matter has nothing to do with itself, is it underestimating its own ability? Parents from all over the world are also invited to share their children's experiences to see who is the culprit?