The power-for-money scandal behind the big prostitution case
Recently, a news of "a police car horn shouting at villagers suspected of soliciting prostitution" has sparked heated discussions on the Internet. Some netizens believe that the police are bullying honest people by handling an ordinary case of soliciting prostitution with such fanfare, while turning a blind eye to more serious cases of power-for-money transaction corruption. So, what's really going on? Let's find out.
The available information shows that the party Li is not an "honest person". After being summoned several times and "mediating", the incident was triggered because he "failed to negotiate" the amount. It can be seen that Li is indeed suspected of illegal prostitution.
However, the police publicized "Li Moumou is suspected of soliciting prostitution" in the whole village, although it does not constitute a crime in itself, it is very likely to infringe on Li's privacy and is a violation of discipline and regulations.
It is worth mentioning that, according to the law, the time limit for prosecution of prostitution cases is 6 months. The evidence that the police determined that Li was a prostitute was a transfer record from 7 months ago. It can be seen that the police have exceeded the scope of their statutory authority.
One explanation is that they may have used this incident as a "bargaining chip" to try to extort money from Li. If it is true, it is already suspected of a crime and constitutes the crime of extortion.
Some netizens questioned why corrupt elements who traded power for money "could not escape the law"? In fact, the discipline inspection commission and supervision commission have always been very severe in punishing such violations of discipline and law.
The so-called "power trading" refers to officials taking advantage of their power to have improper sexual relations with subordinates or businessmen and seek benefits for the other party. On the other hand, "money and sex trading" mainly refers to the act of buying and selling private relationships.
Once these corrupt elements are verified, they are usually severely punished by "double opening" and being transferred to the judicial organs. It can be said that the Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision will not be soft and will "dig deep and thoroughly investigate" the relevant corruption problems.
On the face of it, the police's handling of prostitution cases may be biased. But if there is a suspicion of extortion, it means that the justice himself has become the lawbreaker, and the sin is unforgivable.
In contrast, those corrupt elements involved in the trading of power for money, although they are embarrassed, have not escaped the punishment of the law. Treating everyone equally and handling cases impartially is the duty and ethics that the people's public security should have.
An ordinary case of soliciting prostitutes has become a window to analyze social contradictions and pursue the fairness of the rule of law. We have reason to believe that as long as we persist in taking the facts as the criterion, all the evils will eventually be revealed. Let's look forward to the truth coming out!
What do you think about this?
Feel free to comment in the comment section