#精品长文创作季#
As the saying goes, if you can't stay in the city, you go back to the countryside to live. But now everyone is discovering that it is not realistic to go back to the countryside. Not only can they not afford to buy a house in the big cities, but they also have no place to build a house when they return to the countryside, and it is becoming more and more difficult to approve homesteads.
The peasants are very dissatisfied with this, and do they want to push themselves into a desperate position? They do not even leave themselves the opportunity to return to the rural areas, and the rural homesteads are not originally intended for the peasants?
In this regard, experts said that these homesteads are of a certain use, and once the homesteads are released, they will not bring convenience to farmers, but will bring trouble to everyone.
After reading this article, I will take you to understand the story behind the homestead.
1. The homestead cannot be approved, but it must be approved in accordance with the regulations
Now many farmers say that homestead land is becoming more and more difficult to obtain. I have been in the big city for so many years, and I can't make enough money to buy a house in the big city.
As a result, when I wanted to go back to the countryside to build my own house, I found that I still couldn't build a house. Because there is no vacant homestead, the original house can only be demolished to build a house.
At this time, some netizens will point out that since this is the case, it would be good to tear down these old houses and build houses, but the real situation is not so simple.
First of all, we must make a clear question, that is, the rural homestead is not meant to be divided into a piece for everyone.
In this way, it is obviously impossible that most of the land of the entire country would have been used as homesteads.
At present, the existing homestead is arranged on a one-by-one basis. A family can only have one homestead, and a house can only be built on this land.
But the reality is that demolishing a house is not an easy task. There are two situations when building a house in the countryside, one is that you want to renovate or expand your own house.
Of course, expansion was not possible, so at most they were only allowed to rebuild on their own homestead.
Then there is the situation where there is a new housing need in the family, generally speaking, the child gets married, or a new child is born in the family.
With the increasing number of people in the family, the original housing naturally cannot meet everyone's needs. So they want to build a house, they want a new homestead.
After all, there are more and more people in the family, and if they are all crowded together, new conflicts will constantly occur. In this case, it is better to live separately.
When everyone wanted a new homestead, they found that the state and the government did not approve it for themselves, which made them very distressed.
In fact, it is not that the homestead cannot be approved, but it must be approved in accordance with the regulations. When the application criteria for homestead are met, there are certain criteria for how big and where the homestead is divided.
The main contradiction between the two sides is that the peasants feel that the land they currently own belongs to them, and that it is their freedom to build houses on it.
For these lands, farmers only have the right to use them, and after a certain number of years, farmers are even likely to lose their right to use them.
The state has laws that clearly stipulate where the house is built and how much land it wants to occupy must meet the standards of homestead.
Some people want to build on their own agricultural land, which is absolutely not allowed and is illegal. It is not right for farmers to be unaware of the plans and policies and only want to expand their houses.
In some areas, even the renovation of old houses has to be submitted for approval, and the renovation of these houses is only allowed after approval. Therefore, it is necessary to understand more about national policies, and never think that you can build your house wherever you want.
Second, farmers are eager for homesteads, but government officials are not active
Objectively speaking, the homestead land can indeed be approved, but the approval materials handed in by ordinary farmers have been lost in the sea, and there is no response.
In fact, it is inseparable from the work attitude of governments at all levels, and government personnel do not take these things to heart, or perhaps they do not want to waste their efforts at all.
Take the county-level government as an example, if there is an application for homestead land in the local village, these materials must be handed over to the county-level government.
There is a high probability that this material is imperfect and may even contain a lot of errors. Farmers do not have the ability to discern whether the material is correct or not, and think that they are doing the right thing.
However, the staff believes that if these materials are sent back to tell them why they are wrong, it will take time and energy to explain the problems to the migrant workers.
It is very likely that the farmers will not be able to do so in the future, and they need to explain or assist in changing it many times, which is indeed a complicated process.
Even if these application procedures are completed, it will require the staff to continue to visit the site to conduct multiple surveys to ensure that there are no mistakes in the final division of the homestead.
Who should be responsible for the expenses incurred in the travel and the expenses incurred in the process of work?
Because there is no complete system to stipulate who should pay for this part of the expenses, and the county does not set the relevant expenses for this part, in the end, it is natural that the staff will pay out of their own pockets.
For a long time, who would want to? If this land is divided into homesteads, it is likely to affect agricultural land.
The state has strict regulations on agricultural land, and if the homestead occupies agricultural land, the county must make adjustments, whether it is land compensation or property compensation, this problem needs to be solved.
In the case of land compensation, it is also difficult to solve the problem of which part of the land should be used for agricultural land.
If it is monetary compensation, then the county treasury will have to pay out of pocket to make up for the losses caused by these homesteads.
For some county-level areas that are not financially wealthy, this behavior will undoubtedly increase the burden on county-level finances, and in serious cases, it will even cause financial constraints and make other places short of money.
When this work is delegated to township-level units, it is another big problem. Because the current township-level units are not familiar with this part of the work, they themselves do not know how this work should be carried out.
They also don't know what to do about how to apply for a homestead that occupies agricultural land.
After that, they had to continue a series of land surveying work, which they also felt very troubled. Some of these details are also difficult for people to understand, and in the actual situation, the development of rural work is even more troublesome.
Some villagers don't want to lose their agricultural land, but also want their own homesteads. Even if you want to turn other land into your own homestead, this is a non-compliant operation.
The peasants did not know why, they just took it for granted that the land could be used for themselves. It is difficult for the staff to explain these problems to them, and the consequences of wrong explanations can be serious.
Adhering to the attitude of doing more and making more mistakes, it is better not to do nothing, these staff naturally do not want to cause themselves in trouble. But it is also because of this that it is more difficult to carry out these tasks.
Third, the homestead land cannot be released because of national strategic considerations
The peasants are very dissatisfied with this, in this case, why can't the homestead policy be relaxed, when everyone can divide the homestead at will, there will be no need for staff.
On the surface, the liberalization of homesteads has brought great convenience to the peasants. However, in the long run, it is not conducive to the development of rural areas and even the whole country.
The first is the issue of rural planning, and for the time being, rural homesteads should be clustered together, not only to facilitate management, but also to facilitate the provision of natural gas or heating.
Naturally, it can also ensure that everyone is in a relatively safe environment, and if the homestead is released, everyone will divide the homestead by themselves later.
In this way, whether from the perspective of appearance or internal management, it is far less convenient than centralized management.
The state is also designed to protect agricultural land. As we all know, China is a big grain producer and has a very large population.
Maintaining a stable supply of grain is a very important issue for China, and while China imports a large amount of grain from abroad, it must also ensure its own grain production.
Therefore, the state's strict control of homesteads is also to ensure agricultural land and long-term peace and stability of the country.
If the homestead is released, everyone can build a house as much as they want, although they have been satisfied in a short period of time.
But in the long run, it's not a good deal. When there is a problem with the food supply, the society will gradually become unstable.
Finally, there is a very important reason, and that is the long-term development of the country. From the very beginning, China has developed from the countryside.
In order to shift the focus of social development from rural to urban, China has made great efforts to achieve today's results.
If the homestead is opened, then many people will return to the countryside, and they will be more reluctant to develop in the big cities, preferring to return to the countryside to build houses.
After all, the money to buy a house in a big city is more than enough to build two houses in the countryside. When everyone adjusts to life in the countryside, more and more people will leave the big cities.
In this way, the country has worked hard for so many years to achieve urbanization, and gradually transform into township. In a way, this is a social regression.
In a very short period of time, so many years of development will be brought back to square one. At that time, the whole society will become unimaginable, so the homestead is not only a piece of land, but also related to the fate of the whole country.
epilogue
In fact, the main thing is that everyone's housing needs are not met. If everyone can afford to buy a house or have a place to live in the big city, they will not be willing to go back to the countryside.
Then the current homestead in the countryside can fully meet everyone's needs, and there is no need to add additional homesteads. Therefore, the state should solve the housing problem of the people in a timely manner and complete the implementation of the last mile policy.
Sources of information:
http://journal.crnews.net/ncjygl/2018n/d11q/ggsl/925887_20181130080026.html-Rural Business Management-China Rural Network