Kailu County's spring plowing is blocked: a land contract triggered the "Rashomon"
Opening remarks: The land, this ancient yellow skin, carries the Chinese nation's thousands of years of agricultural civilization. However, in Kailu County in the northeast, a dispute over land contracting is like a stubborn stone, stirring up a thousand waves. Is it driven by interests, or is it a misunderstanding of the contract? Is it the brutal law enforcement at the grassroots level, or is it the one-sided report of the media? Let us uncover the truth of this "Rashomon" together.
In the vast black soil of the northeast, a piece of land in Kailu County has become the focus of attention. It was not because of the joy of the harvest, but because of a dispute over a land contract.
The story begins in 2004, when the Zhang brothers signed a 30-year contract with the Shuangsheng Village Committee. The contract is written in black and white, stipulating the use of the land and the conditions for its transfer and lease. However, time is a double-edged sword, sharpening some people while also exposing the nature of others. Soon after the contract, the Zhang brothers subleased part of the land at a high price, quietly changing the nature and use of the land. Not only did they conceal the explicit terms of the land use in the contract, but they also turned from land contractors to "middlemen", earning high profits.
The wheels of time are rolling forward, and it is 2018 in the blink of an eye. This year, the "three adjustments of the land" came as scheduled, and the nature of this land has become arable land. Taking into account the actual situation, the Government decided to adopt a flexible approach to renegotiate the contract price. However, the village committee negotiated with the Zhang brothers to revise the contract several times, but repeatedly ran into a wall. The Zhang brothers seemed to have evaporated from the world, passing the buck to each other, delaying time, and refusing to show up to negotiate.
In this dispute, the behavior of grassroots staff Ji Yunhao and others has also attracted widespread attention. The simple and crude way of working and emotional expression they showed in dealing with the incident undoubtedly added fuel to the fire. In the whirlpool of public opinion, they became the target of public criticism.
In this turmoil, the media also played an important role. One of the videos they posted quickly sparked a frenzy of public opinion. However, this video is suspected of deliberately editing and guiding public opinion. It did not release the complete communication process, but only intercepted some fragments, which made people question the truth of the incident more.
With the fermentation of public opinion, more doubts surfaced. Some netizens questioned whether there was a transfer of interests behind the Zhang brothers, and some people questioned the rationality of the cultivated land charging policy. What's more, some trolls have a rhythm at the beginning of public opinion, trying to sway the public's judgment.
In the whirlpool of this dispute, Ji Yunhao and other grassroots staff were dismissed. This is undoubtedly a severe test of their working methods and ability to respond to public opinion. However, should we also reflect on what deep-seated problems are hidden in this seemingly simple land contract dispute?
Perhaps, this is not only a dispute over land contracting, but also a battle of human nature, morality and law. There is no real winner in this contest. Although the Zhang brothers made a temporary profit, they lost people's trust and respect; despite the efforts of the grassroots workers, they were controversial because of improper methods and methods; and although the Sannong media attracted attention, it also aroused people's concerns about the authenticity of the news.
When we look back on this dispute, we cannot help but ask: Whose fault is this? Is it the greed of the Zhang brothers? Is it the dereliction of duty of the grassroots workers? Or is it a one-sided report by the media? Perhaps, everyone is responsible, or perhaps, everyone is just a pawn in this "Rashomon."
In this dispute caused by land contracting, we see the greed of human nature, the degradation of morality and the helplessness of the law. However, we have also seen people's desire for truth and their quest for justice. I hope that this dispute can bring us deep reflection and let us move forward more cautiously on the road ahead.
In conclusion, I would like to say that land is the lifeblood of farmers and the foundation of the country. We should cherish every inch of land, respect every contract, and safeguard everyone's rights and interests. Only in this way can our society be more harmonious and stable, and our country can be more prosperous.
So, what do you think about this matter? Do you support the Zhang brothers' actions, or do you think that grassroots workers and the media should bear more responsibility? In any case, we should maintain a rational and objective attitude, not be swayed by public opinion, and insist on our own judgment and thinking. Because in this era of information explosion, the truth is often not so simple and obvious.