laitimes

Realistically speaking, is it reasonable to determine that Yu Han interfered with Yan Junling's compliance beyond his position?

author:芹AHjA

At the last moment of the game, the Shenhua team, which was originally one goal behind, seemed to have staged a reversal scene, and Wang Haijian broke through the opponent's door directly and beautifully, but all these good scenes became confusing because of the word "offside".

Realistically speaking, is it reasonable to determine that Yu Han interfered with Yan Junling's compliance beyond his position?

Let's talk about this so-called offside first, Yu Hanchao was judged by the referee to interfere with the goalkeeper Yan Junling of the harbor team when attacking the goal, and the referee Fu Ming decided to cancel the goal that could have allowed Shenhua to overtake the score after VAR replay. According to the rules, it is true that if there is an action that interferes with the opponent's goalkeeper, then the ball cannot be counted. But the question is, is this interference enough to justify the reason to cancel the goal?

Realistically speaking, is it reasonable to determine that Yu Han interfered with Yan Junling's compliance beyond his position?

The atmosphere on the field of play can be described as touching, and the fans of Harbour and Shenhua are nervously watching the big screen, waiting for the final decision of the referee. The details are very important, and it can be seen in the replay that Yu Hanchao is indeed in a more subtle position, but whether he really affected Yan Junling's sight or movements, this is debatable. On the football field, every small action can change the outcome of the game, but at the same time, every penalty needs to be very deliberate, after all, it is about the score and the fate of both teams.

Realistically speaking, is it reasonable to determine that Yu Han interfered with Yan Junling's compliance beyond his position?

Next, there is the endless what ifs in the hearts of Shenhua fans - if this ball is effective, then the whole game may go completely differently. In this game, apart from this cancelled goal, both sides actually played very well. The Harbour defended tightly, and Shenhua's offense was also full of opportunities. Wang Haijian's shot on goal can be said to have condensed the efforts and expectations of the Shenhua team throughout the game, but it came to naught because of a controversial penalty.

Realistically speaking, is it reasonable to determine that Yu Han interfered with Yan Junling's compliance beyond his position?

The referee's decision is not only a technical judgment, but also a psychological test. The race ended in a victory for Harbour, but the post-race discussion was far from over. Whether in a coffee shop or on the Internet, everyone is hotly discussing the fairness and reasonableness of this verdict. This discussion is not only a review of the game, but also an in-depth discussion of the understanding of football rules and the transparency of referees' decisions.

In the passionate sport of football, every blow can change the history of the game. And for fans, every game is not only a competition, but also an emotional baptism. The controversial penalty left too many "ifs" in this game, and it also made us realize once again that the rigor and fairness of the rules are the eternal theme of football.

What can we learn from this game? First of all, respect and understanding of the rules, and secondly, the attitude of giving your all in every game. Regardless of the outcome, competitive sports always excite people, and that's the charm of it. I hope that in the future competitions, we can see more exciting matchups, and at the same time, I also hope that the relevant rules and referees' judgments can be more transparent and fair, so that every game can be fair and just in front of the world.

Read on