The key knowledge points of the 2024 law exam will be pushed daily.
Every day (Monday to Friday at 9 a.m.), an objective question will be pushed.
It is pushed synchronously in the order of civil law, criminal law, administrative law, civil procedure, criminal procedure, commercial and economic knowledge, three kingdom law, and theoretical law.
I hope that you can use your spare time every day to learn a key knowledge point.
Students who need a PDF version can chat with me privately!
After reading the knowledge points in the picture, you can try to do this question by yourself, and then type the answer in the comment area, and then go to see the answer and analysis of the last picture.
19-02-Unknown
Yan is an employee of a company and is assigned by the unit to drive a motor vehicle to inspect the company's business. Yan drove a motor vehicle while drunk, and the vehicle rolled over due to improper operation, resulting in death from head injury. Later, Yan's wife, Wu, applied to the Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau, requesting that Yan's death be determined as a work-related injury, and the Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau made a decision not to recognize the work-related injury. Wu then applied to the Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security for administrative reconsideration, requesting that the decision of the Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau not to recognize the work-related injury be revoked. The Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security made an administrative reconsideration decision after reconsideration, and upheld the decision of the Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau not to recognize the work-related injury. Wu filed an administrative lawsuit with the court. The following statements are correct:
A. The determination of work-related injury is an administrative confirmation
B. The determination of work-related injuries is an administrative ruling
C. Wu has the standing to be a plaintiff
D. The Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau and the Provincial Human Resources and Social Security Department are the defendants in this case