Over the years, the United States has often boasted of being the world's policeman, and his long-arm jurisdiction is indispensable to where there is chaos. The inconsistency between what is on the outside and what is on the outside is also despised by countless countries. Even so, for the sake of economic interests, they continue to provoke wars and put innocent people in dire straits. Nowadays, the media is developed, and more and more people have despised what they do
Loading...
Blinken's recent visit to China has attracted attention from all over the world, and although he is here to ask for help, his expression is still high. Before returning to the United States, Blinken gave an interview to the BBC. It is estimated that if he had known the content of the interview in advance, Blinken might not have accepted this interview, because this interview made him lose face
In the interview video released by the global network, we saw that the BBC reporter came up and asked Blinken a soul question. Such frank and straightforward questions have thrown Blinken into a mess. The beautiful reporter asked why the United States vetoed Palestine at a joint congress some time ago, and many countries agreed to it.
This kind of heart-to-heart questioning has thrown Blinken into a mess. Blinken said the classic quote, first of all, this question is long and long-standing, and the United States has also put forward many proposals, including letting the United States manage Palestine on its behalf
Blinken was interrupted by a reporter at this point, and the beautiful reporter said that she should pay attention to the problem at hand, and now that we are in an unprecedented crisis, should the United States listen to the ideas of other countries?
Blinken defended that what we're doing now is not taking action that will lead to anything, and the beautiful reporter said, then what we're seeing now is catastrophic consequences, and you're sitting in China and talking, and the people of Gaza are in dire straits. You are asking China to stop supplying parts to Russia, while you are supplying weapons to Israel in large quantities to kill. The reporter asked: Don't you think that doing so will damage the credibility of the United States?
Blinken's defense said that the main reason for this was to ensure that Israel had the ability to defend itself. Stop the interview when you're done. Although this interview lasted less than 2 minutes, we can already see that Blinken is extremely reluctant to answer the reporter's questions, and even answering the questions with a pale face is a pale defense. It may not have been expected that Britain is a loyal ally of the United States, and that a BBC reporter would dare to ask such a question, so that it could not come down, but on the other hand, it can also be seen that even the allies of the United States are disdainful of what the United States is doing now, so this interview was arranged. So what do you think about this?