Preface
In the digital age, the boundary between privacy and public opinion supervision has become more and more prominent. Recently, the follow-up issue of the "nanny arson case" in Hangzhou has caused controversy. Lin Shengbin's case against director Liu Xinda for violating privacy has aroused widespread social concern. This case not only involves the protection of personal privacy, but also involves the legitimacy and legitimacy of public opinion supervision.
Loading...
The arson case of the nanny in Hangzhou
At 5 a.m. on June 22, 2017, an arson case occurred in Hangzhou's Blue Qianjiang Community that shocked the whole country. This incident not only caused the loss of four innocent lives, but also left an indelible wound in the hearts of the public. After the incident, the Hangzhou police quickly intervened in the investigation and locked up the suspect Mo Huanjing. Mo Huanjing, as the nanny of the victim's family, actually took advantage of her work to carry out the evil acts of arson and theft. Her actions not only deprived four lives, but also caused irreparable trauma to the victims' families. With the in-depth investigation of the case, Mo Huanjing's criminal motives and methods gradually surfaced, and her cruelty and ruthlessness were outrageous.
Things turned out
In terms of judicial procedures, the case has gone through multiple stages such as arrest, prosecution, first instance, and second instance. The Hangzhou Municipal People's Procuratorate prosecuted Mo Huanjing in accordance with the law, and the court handed down a death sentence after a public trial. Mo Huanjing appealed against the first-instance verdict, but the second-instance court upheld the original verdict. In the end, with the approval of the Supreme People's Court, Mo Huanjing was executed, paying the due price for her crimes.
Things follow-up
However, this did not end the case. Lin Shengbin, a family member of a victim of the "nanny arson incident" in Hangzhou, claimed that he flew from Guangzhou to Hangzhou by plane in the early morning of the day of the crime and was not at the scene of the crime. However, director Liu Xinda expressed doubts about this, and by checking the travel records of many airlines, he found that Lin Shengbin's flight records on the day of the crime did not exist. Subsequently, Liu Xinda posted the query results and call recordings on Weibo, which aroused widespread attention from public opinion. In this regard, the Hangzhou Municipal Joint Investigation Team conducted a comprehensive and meticulous investigation and evidence collection, and finally confirmed that Lin Moubin did not participate in the planning and implementation of the case. This conclusion not only cleared Lin Moubin's grievances, but also drew an end to the entire case.
But do you think that's the end of it? Not really!
After Lin Shengbin cleared his grievances, because Liu Xinda had previously announced his whereabouts on the Weibo platform. He took Liu Xinda and the company operating the Weibo platform to court, accusing him of violating his right to privacy.
Judgment Results
In January, a court ruled that Mr. Liu's actions were an invasion of privacy. But Liu Xinda did not intend to give up, felt that he did not have any problems, and has appealed.
This incident also caused heated discussions among the majority of netizens
Netizen Yi believes that the evidence at that time was not very real, and the trend of public opinion is not towards the end of the case. The case has been full of doubts from beginning to end, and the court should reopen and investigate the case
I really feel that the court can retry Lin Shengbin's case! Since it has aroused so much public opinion, and some people have also put forward questionable evidence in the case, the court should accept it and investigate whether the evidence is true, so as not to let go of any criminal!
Netizen 2 said that Lin Shengbin was originally suspicious and remarried in a year. When he remarried, the partner had already given birth to a child, and it was hard to imagine how disgusted he was with his original family
It's not that he can't return to normal life and remarry, the main thing is that it's too fast, he remarried in just one year, and when he remarried, the children of the remarriage partner were born, it's hard not to be suspicious
Netizen 3 questioned Lin Shengbin's accusations, why did he sue for infringement and not defamation? Is it because he was afraid that the case would be re-investigated at that time and his own fault would be discovered?
Everyone should pay attention to the fact that he only sued Liu Xinda for violating privacy, and did not sue him for defamation!
Netizen 4 said why Liu Xinda made his own contribution to this case, but was prosecuted. The police have not confirmed Lin Shengbin's travel problem
Liu Xinda is doing what the police should do, why is he still being prosecuted, shouldn't the police come out to explain how the issue of fraudulent itinerary passed the trial?
Netizen 5 said that this case has been confusing from beginning to end, and after so many years of closure, there are still many doubts, and there is no convincing statement to prove that Lin Shengbin is innocent, but Lin Shengbin has many doubts
The case has been closed for many years, but it has never dispelled the public's doubts and has become an inexplicable scar. Whether Lin is innocent or really a demon should indeed have an explanation. Otherwise, it will be irresponsible to Lin himself and the public.
Editor's opinion
Regardless of whether Lin Shengbin has a problem or not, I think the court should re-investigate the case and come up with a convincing argument to prove whether Lin Shengbin has a problem. Liu Xinda's actions are obviously for the development of this case, and the court should not punish him. On the other hand, most netizens strongly supported Liu Xinda and raised many doubts about Lin Shengbin, which is the issue that the court should retry. While a large number of netizens supported Liu Xinda, they also questioned the legal system, hoping to make this issue official.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area to discuss!