The latest decision of the well-known Taiwanese artist Da S to let her two children change the surname of her stepfather Gu Junye and become South Korean citizens, has recently detonated heated discussions from all walks of life. The decision not only involves private family matters, but also stirs public attention to multiple sensitive issues such as reputation, property and identity.
The marriage between Da S and her ex-husband Wang Xiaofei was the focus of media attention, and the breakup of the two caused widespread discussion. After marrying Gu Junye, Da S chose to let the children accept their stepfather's surname and obtain Korean citizenship, explaining that the children have fully accepted Gu Junye as their "father". Although this decision reflects the emotional harmony between family members, it also attracts all kinds of speculation and doubts about the child's future.
Changing a surname and nationality is not a trivial matter, especially for two minor children, and it involves many possibilities for their identity and future. The public response was mixed. On the one hand, many netizens support Big S's decision, believing that it is based on the children's approval of their stepfather and the integrity of the family. Proponents believe that family harmony and the emotional stability of children are far more important than inheritance.
On the other hand, there are also many voices who are worried, they question whether Da S is thoughtful, and the child may lose the inheritance right of the original family if he changes his surname and nationality. In this regard, legal experts pointed out that although the issue of inheritance is indeed complex, it is the well-being and mental health of children that should be the most priority.
In addition, cultural scholars mentioned that children's nationality and cultural identity will affect their upbringing and self-perception. Changing the surname and nationality can be confusing for a child's sense of identity, especially during the teenage years, and this change of identity needs to be carefully considered.
Big S's decision is undoubtedly out of love for the family and consideration for the children's emotions, but this behavior also reflects the conflict between individual choices and social expectations in modern families. Societies should be more open and inclusive, allowing individuals to make the best choices for their circumstances.
While the controversy continues, the incident has also led to more reflections on deeper issues about family, inheritance and personal identity. In the future, with the progress of society and the renewal of people's concepts, perhaps we will see more discussions on how to balance the relationship between tradition and modernity, between the individual and the family.
This event reminds us that in today's increasingly globalized world, cross-country and cross-cultural family models will become more common, and the challenges and choices that come with them will become more complex. All sectors of society need to understand and support these emerging families to build a more inclusive and understanding environment.
Regarding the change of surname and nationality of Da S's children, opinions on the Internet have formed a magnificent tide of discussion. Many netizens expressed their opinions on social media, including voices for and against.
Some netizens expressed their understanding and support for Big S's decision-making. They believe that it is more important for children to have a warm family environment than inheritance. One netizen wrote: "Children are able to feel the love from their stepfather, which is irreplaceable by any material thing. Changing their surname symbolizes the beginning of a new family, and it is a positive family decision. Proponents generally agree that love and identity are the most critical elements in building a child's well-being.
On the other hand, some netizens expressed concern or even opposition to this decision. They believe that Big S may not have fully considered the complexities that children may encounter in terms of legal and social status in the future. One dissenting netizen commented: "Changing a child's surname and nationality is a major decision that can have a profound impact on the child's sense of identity and future, especially in terms of inheritance and cultural identity. ”
In response to Big S's decision-making, the reactions of all sectors of society are obviously diverse and complex. This is not only a private family decision, but also touches on multiple aspects such as culture, law and personal identity. We're looking forward to hearing more from our readers:
- What do you think of Big S's decision to let the children change their stepfather's surname and change their nationality?
- What do you think should be the balance between family harmony and personal identity?
- If you had a similar experience, would you like to share how you made your decision?
Please leave your thoughts in the comments section, share your experience or contribute your opinions. Let's explore how the relationship between family, identity and heritage can coexist more harmoniously in modern society.