I just saw the document of 1,700 yuan per mu, and there are new materials.
I just read the document on the subsidy of 1,700 yuan per mu for irrigation land in Inner Mongolia, and my mind is a little out of turn.
Netizens posted a screenshot saying: The saline-alkali land in Kailu County turned into fertile land, which was compliant at that time.
Unexpectedly, I saw a netizen post immediately afterward, saying that the matter of turning the saline-alkali land into fertile land in Kailu County was compliant at that time.
Screenshots of netizens, Kailu County will improve 28,800 mu of land in 2022, which has received a lot of reports and praise.
The netizen also attached a large number of screenshots, and the article was clearly written, in 2022, Jianhua Town, Kailu County, also implemented farmland salinization control and improved 28,800 mu of land, which received a lot of reports and praise.
Kailu County implements farmland salinization control and land improvement, and Jianxin Village and Shuangsheng Village are within its scope.
The article also specifically mentions Jianxin Village and Shuangsheng Village, which improved 6,000 acres of land. Although I did not write how many acres of land Shuangsheng Village has improved, I know that the total cultivated area of Shuangsheng Village is 41,000 mu. The improved area of the entire Jianhua Town adds up, which is 28,800 mu!
The state spent a huge amount of 3.086 billion yuan to improve saline-alkali land.
Moreover, the government has invested 3.086 billion yuan in the improvement of saline-alkali land in Inner Mongolia. The article also said that the increase in corn yield is also obvious, and the yield can be increased by 200 catties per mu, which is similar to the increase in yield that farmers said.
Therefore, in the context of that time, the matter of saline-alkali land becoming fertile land was indeed in line with the regulations.
Source: China County Economic News, which is directly under the Economic Daily.
The netizen said that according to the report of the China County Economic News, it is basically the same situation as the farmers said, that is, the saline-alkali land becomes fertile land, rather than the grassland becomes watered. The farmers have put in a lot of effort.
When others make improvements, you still report happily, and the credit is yours. Now that people have it done, you will collect the money?
Ah, the bad thing is that the village suddenly started collecting money. What are you anxious about? You can collect money when the contract expires. When people develop the land, you know it, and you report it happily, and the credit is all yours. Now that people have it done, you will collect the money?
That's not quite right. The mayor also said that most of the people's contracts in the village have not expired, and the small farmers have paid them, but the big farmers have not paid them, and the reason is simple, there is too much money to pay at one time.
Netizen: Where did the 3.086 billion yuan of state allocation go?
After reading this article, some netizens said, "Hurry up and find out where the 3.086 billion yuan of state appropriation was spent?" The peasant households still said that they paid for the improvement themselves! Some netizens said that the peasants still understand the peasants, and this article makes it clear.
If it is true, it can only be said that the farmer may have a way, but it is not illegal.
This netizen's point of view is that this matter is really not a simple contract issue. Twenty years ago, the farmer may have had a way to contract land for pasture at a low price to help the local economy.
Later, due to policy changes, the local government needed to hand over the operation and vigorously promote the transformation of saline-alkali land into fertile land. It can only be said that there are some wind directions that are difficult for ordinary farmers to predict or obtain.
Those huge subsidies, do you think, stand up to scrutiny?
This thing is getting more and more brain-burning. If the screenshot posted by this netizen is true, it is indeed beyond the scope of the contract, and it involves more national policies and huge subsidies from the state. And those huge subsidies, do you think, stand up to scrutiny?