The CPU of the Snapdragon 8gen3 is close to the 10th generation i5 10400
GPU相当于780m核显或1050ti
I'm not surprised that the graphics card performance reaches 780m
The power consumption of the 780M core display is not high, only more than 20 watts
The technology used in mobile phones is more advanced
It is also normal for TSMC to have a higher energy consumption ratio of 4nm
And this is the result of 8Gen3 running at 13 watts of power consumption
Usually mobile phones can't run this performance at all
As for the CPU approaching i5 10400, I don't believe this a bit
ARM and X86, the architecture is different, how is this measured
10400 single-core poor, but multi-core strong, after all, it is a CPU with 6 cores and 12 threads, and the overall performance is stronger than i3 12100
If you open a few more apps on your phone, there will be Caton, and it's a simple architecture of Arm, so how can you compare it with 10400
Geek Bay chose the last generation of the SKL architecture to compare the single-core performance. The architecture of this thing is actually not fundamentally different from the 6th generation core, it is the old architecture of eight years ago, and the single-core performance is about equal to the level of the current 13th/14th generation small cores. Arm's super-large core is not something to show off in itself against the small core of X86
According to the power consumption test of Geek Bay, the best CPU power consumption of 8Gen3 when running Geekbench5 can reach about 15W, while in the GPU test, the GPU power consumption can reach about 14W. With such a high power consumption, it is obviously impossible to run continuously on a normal mobile phone. Therefore, there is a difference between the performance of the benchmark and the continuous performance of the actual operation is the actual performance.
If you have to give full play to the performance of 8gen3, not only do you need to disassemble the phone to change the heat dissipation, but you even need external power supply, of course, you also need to root the phone to pull the performance scheduling full, but this is already what a laptop should do.
In fact, the performance issues between ARM and x86 architectures are far from the difference between "complex" and "simple" as many people think. For example, x86 as a complex instruction set can directly give a complex instruction to "eat", while arm, as a reduced instruction set, needs to be divided into instructions such as "take the bowl", "take the chopsticks", "put it in the mouth" and so on. The goal (eating) is practically the same.
This is also the reason why the software natively developed for the processors of the M-series ARM instruction set finally achieves the performance of the software that meets its benchmark score after all Apple computers are on the Mac.
Moreover, with the development of ARM and x86, in order to cope with today's specific application development and operation practices, x86 is becoming less and less "complex", and ARM is becoming less and less "streamlined". This is the constant "evolution" that is going on in order to actually run the software.
As consumers, we don't need to worry about "complexity" and "simplicity", we just need to know how effective the software will ultimately be.