What do you feel when you are swiped by this title? Are you angry at such landlord behavior, or do you have an opinion on the way the relevant government departments deal with it? In fact, such things have been happening around us, but it was only exposed by the media this time that it aroused everyone's heated discussions and thoughts.
Whether you are a landlord or a tenant, I believe you have your own opinion on such things. So, today we will talk about the damage assessment of the lantern in detail, to see what problems it reflects in the society, and how to solve them.
The cause of the lantern damage assessment incident
The word lantern damage assessment has recently become popular on the Internet. In fact, this is a rental dispute incident that originated in Jiangxi. The cause of the incident is this, not long ago, Guo Moulin, a landlord in Yushan County, recruited a group of people with searchlights in their hands, and came to his rental house with "lanterns". At that time, there happened to be a couple of tenants who wanted to check out, but they didn't expect Guo Moulin to take a searchlight and come to a "damage assessment" in front of them.
The reason why the landlord Guo Moulin "carried the lamp to assess the damage" without authorization was that he felt that his house was very dirty by the tenant, and there were some scratches on the floor and wall, so he wanted to take advantage of the dark and high wind at night to use the searchlight to "check and fill in the gaps", and finally asked the tenant for nearly 10,000 yuan in "damage assessment". The situation at that time was like archaeology, but Guo Moulin's purpose was not pure, so as soon as such an act came out, it immediately aroused the doubts and onlookers of the people around him.
The problem behind the lantern damage assessment
In fact, there are not one or two such things, but other landlords choose different ways and methods, some will "scribble" when the tenant moves out, and some will take advantage of the tenant's absence to "renovate" and so on. It's just that this time Guo Moulin chose to use a searchlight at night, and this method of "lantern damage assessment" is too novel, which makes people can't help but want to complain and watch.
However, regardless of the purpose of doing this, I believe that everyone agrees on the same opinion, that is, to condemn and blame such behavior. In this incident, everyone can clearly see whether Guo Moulin's behavior of "carrying a lantern to assess damage" is really because the house was damaged, but for other purposes, just to "blackmail" the tenant, which is obviously illegal and certain.
Therefore, when encountering such a thing, whether it is a tenant or other landlords, they should know how to use the weapon of the law to protect themselves, and at the same time, they should also know how to "screen" such a situation, and not be used or coerced by people with ulterior motives.
The impact of the lantern damage assessment event
In today's Internet era, everyone can become a part of public opinion supervision, and they all have the right and opportunity to speak out. Therefore, when an incident such as the lantern damage assessment is exposed, the impact behind it is also very large. First of all, such an event will be concerned and discussed by the public, and everyone will think deeply about the "conflict of interest", and will also discuss and interpret the relevant policies and laws.
At the same time, it can also arouse everyone's attention and attention to the problem of "illegal construction", as well as the thinking of "housing rental". After all, in today's social life, such and such problems emerge one after another, and we also need such things to "activate" our thinking, so that we can look at and solve these problems more rationally.
What should we do in the face of lantern damage assessment
First of all, we should not be impulsive, no matter which side we are, we should remain rational, and we must also know how to "seek verification" and not easily trust one of them. At the same time, they should also know how to use the weapon of the law to protect themselves, and if they encounter similar "rights protection" problems, they can find relevant consulting agencies or lawyers to help them, or they can appeal and solve problems through the public.
In addition, it is also hoped that there will be some improvement in the management and supervision of society, whether it is in the handling of the problem of "illegal construction" or in the protection of "housing rental", it is necessary to have a stricter and more perfect system, and it is also necessary to have sufficient public opinion supervision and participation, so that all kinds of social problems can be better solved, and only then can everyone be able to live and develop in a "fair" and "just" social environment.
The damage assessment of the lantern seems to be just a rental dispute, but the problems reflected behind it are very rich and profound, and it also teaches us a lesson. In dealing with this issue, I also hope that the relevant departments can make a difference, give the public a satisfactory answer and the results of the handling, and also hope that everyone can get some inspiration and thinking from it.