Before reading this article, I sincerely invite you to click the "Follow" button, so that you can continue to push such articles in the future, and at the same time, it is also convenient for you to discuss and share, your support is the motivation for me to continue to report#HeadlineCreationChallenge##CBA测试#
In the CBA, every competition is not only a competition of skills, but also a duel of will and sportsmanship. The battle between the Guangdong team and the Guangsha team is both passionate and controversial. The Guangdong team, which was without Zhou Qi, did not show weakness as expected by the outside world, and had a lead of about 20 points at halftime. What is clear is that the players' spirit of resilience fills the disadvantage caused by the personnel vacancy.
However, there were several violent incidents during the game, which were worrying. Sun Minghui and Xu Zhonghao's continuous foul actions caused painful criticism, which completely ignited the smell of gunpowder on the field. In particular, the picture of Zhang Mingchi falling to the ground injured and his face swollen and unable to return to the stadium immediately touched the hearts of countless fans.
Although the Guangdong team has an advantage with superb skills, it has also paid a huge price for it. After the referee concluded that he was "suspected of being a waste person", Sun Minghui's behavior of openly slandering and challenging the majesty of the home court was even more slandered. And Xu Zhonghao directly caused Zhang Mingchi's face to swell, which is embarrassing and makes us think deeply: Should CBA games conduct stricter self-examination, especially in the handling of fouls, more clear standards are needed?
Regarding the referee's penalty - when Zhou Qi was banned for two games for elbow swings, the referee, who was supposed to be on the front line of preventing bad fouls, only gave ordinary foul punishment in the face of Xu Zhonghao's obviously malicious foul behavior, which was greatly questioned. The anger of the fans is not only directed at the misconduct of the players themselves, but also at the unconvincing "black whistle" voices.
If the CBA fails to reduce the frequency of such incidents to a minimum, where will such a league go? If this becomes the norm, who will be the victims? Where will the entire basketball environment shift?
After all, the competition is a passing thing, but the scars and reflections left behind need to be taken care of and deepened for a long time. We will never resist a high-quality, all-out game, but it must not be based on harming others, harming the health and safety of others.
The Guangdong team won the victory, but this victory in Zhou Qi's absence was not easy. Players have to manage the scoreline, physical and mental pressure at the same time in the face of vicious collisions and tactical squabbles – a difficult and worrying balance. We expect each competition to faithfully reflect the skills and aesthetics of the athletes, rather than becoming a forum for criticizing the moral demeanor of the participants.
Therefore, we hope to hear the CBA league's official response to this incident and make clear sanctions for behaviors that affect the fairness of the event. When the competitive state fluctuates and when the character problem gradually becomes prominent, what everyone wants to see more is a fair and just competitive environment, strong and effective regulatory measures, sincere and fearless apologies and a positive attitude of improvement.
The stories of the fallen sidelines, the underestimated effects of the contests, and the issues that extend behind them – values and trust – all require us to collectively cherish the basketball culture we love. Remember, "Friendship first, competition second".