laitimes

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

author:Ximen Daguan people

Three circulars, revealing layers of secrets?

On the 24th, as soon as the third situation report of Kailu County came out, we discovered that there was a lot of information behind this kind of land, and the contractor made a big profit of 3.5 million yuan a year from changing hands.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

The first point of the notice: the additional package fee is reasonable, legal and compliant.

The circular talked about three points, to the effect that the new cultivated land is subject to paid use fees, which is a pilot of the state's "third land adjustment" policy, which is reasonable, legal and compliant.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

The second point of the report: Zhang Moumou is registered in Shenzhen, and the contracted land is thorough: building a dairy farm and planting forage.

But this Zhang Moumou, he is not our local, his household registration is Shenzhen, Guangdong, and in 2004, he signed a lease contract with the village for 5,600 acres of barren marsh meadows, saying that it was used to build dairy farms and grow forage.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?
Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

The third point of the notification: Changing hands on the contracted land, 4 yuan becomes more than 700 yuan, making a big profit.

As a result, he cultivated the land privately, turned the pasture into irrigated land, and subleased it to others, harvesting 700 yuan per mu per year.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

If true, the contractor will make a big profit of 3.5 million a year.

According to this report, we found that the contractor earns 3.5 million a year, which, if true, is indeed tempting. But there are two details of the briefing, which have not yet been disclosed.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

First, the year in which the contractor began to change hands.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

Second, to say that it is a Shenzhen household registration refers to whether it was already a Shenzhen household registration in 2004 or a Shenzhen household registration now.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

Netizen: To put it mildly, 20 years ago, no one wanted to give away this place!

If the contractor is indeed a capital tycoon, he has contracted 5,000 mu of land in one go, and the rent is still so cheap at 4 yuan per mu, and later the saline-alkali land will be turned into cultivated land, and it will not be on the line, at most the contract will be changed.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

A netizen said it well: "To put it mildly, no one wanted to give away this land 20 years ago!"

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

Wouldn't Ji Yunhao become a scapegoat? The idiom "Yunhao stops farming" has to disappear from the dictionary?

Anyway, this thing is really getting more and more incomprehensible, and netizens are also dumbfounded, playing reversal every day, who should they believe? If this is the case, then wouldn't Ji Yunhao become a scapegoat? The idiom "Yunhao stops farming" has to disappear from the dictionary.

Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?
Kailu's third report: The contractor earns 3.5 million a year from changing hands, and this reversal is a veto?

Let's wait and see who can have the last laugh!