In today's online environment, it is easy to go to extremes, either to lift you up to the sky or to devalue you. People seem to be enthusiastic about this kind of god-making, and it is clear that this does not conform to objective laws.
近期，写了一篇关于董宇辉在北京电影节上演讲的文章，就遭到了无脑喷
Originally, I wrote this article just to truthfully express my feelings after watching it, and I didn't mean to be "black" or belittled at all, after all, everyone's tastes and preferences are different.
On the whole, I think Dong Yuhui's appearance on such an occasion is somewhat abrupt.
In addition, in terms of the content and style of the speech, Dong Yuhui not only wants to show the humor of a talk show actor, but also wants to not lose the literary demeanor of a reader, and also wants to set off the grand idea of the Spring Festival movie.
It is this kind of thinking, thinking, and thinking in the adult year that makes the whole speech seem a little nondescript, more like the yellowed chicken soup text in the early years of Reader's Digest.
Even so, there are still many people who like to smack, and the old chicken soup just bursts out with a new taste. Not only that, but they not only like it themselves, but they also force others to like it too, otherwise, they will criticize you at every turn.
Among these people, some people really like Dong Yuhui, which is understandable, but there is always a vague feeling that some "water army" is mixed in, and no one is allowed to have a different voice.
In addition, there are some people who do not know the truth may also be mixed in, these people are the most pitiful, and they are the most cheerful and distracted, but they don't know that many people are just professionals, and they don't really go to their hearts.
真假粉丝们，都喜欢对不符合自己认知的事情，选择性视而不见
The small composition turmoil that caused a stir at the beginning did not give an explanation in the end. Everyone has a showdown, the anchor is in front of the camera, and behind it is the copywriting team.
Is it so difficult to just admit this? It is obviously an objective thing, but it should be branded as claiming to know the business very well and replying.
Can the behind-the-scenes team only be silent lambs? Where there is oppression, there is resistance, and there are still editors who come out to resist and clarify.
Besides, Dongfang Xiaosun, such a senior veteran who has made outstanding contributions to Dongfang selection, even for Dong Yuhui, should be regarded as having the grace of knowing each other.
可就因为一场风波，为了保住所谓的流量担当，就被迫免去CEO的职务，非执行董事的身份也被取消。
Even Teacher Yu Minhong seems to be cautious and sincere in front of Dong Yuhui, and he has to apologize from time to time.
郭松民的评价有些过激，但也显得深刻
郭松民，是一位独立新闻评论员、独立学者，还有着空军中校军衔，他一向以敢言善辩著称。
looked at his evaluation of Dong Yuhui, his words were very sharp, and even a little excessive, but they were also more incisive.
First of all, the external aspect, the appearance and temperament are rustic, I think this is okay, after all, everyone has their own characteristics, and the rustic atmosphere is not necessarily bad, indicating that it is more down-to-earth, which may be the reason why many iron fans like it.
The hairstyle is funny, it may be the stylist's problem, and it is also a way of thinking to look tall when it is fried.
The clothes are conservative and outdated, is it offending the costumer, that set of clothes is indeed a little lowered.
Speaking of the internal aspect, the jokes are very cold, and they are indeed not as effective as talk comedians.
Sensational sentences are very boring, like the low-level Zhu Jun, the chicken soup text in "Reader's Digest", these are very vivid, and the content of the speech is indeed a bit clichéd, and there is nothing new at all.