In a specific field of public opinion, Belarusian President Lukashenko has both "eyes" and "popularity", so some people call him "Lu Yuanwai". Such a title is not only not malicious, but adds a bit of intimacy.
Old Lu is very good at talking and praising people. Its linguistic characteristics are relatively "oriental", easy to understand, and easy to resonate. Some say he is "resourceful", while others say he is "cunning". However, in terms of international games, "cunning and cunning" is not derogatory.
Another characteristic or bright spot of "Lu Yuanwai" is that his analysis and exposition of the international situation is often "to the point," but after careful recollection, he feels that "there is something in his words." For example, his latest interpretation of the "big triangle" relationship between China, the United States, and Russia is quite "intriguing".
According to a report by the Belarusian News Agency, on April 24, local time, at the seventh session of the "All-Belarusian People's Congress", Belarusian President Lukashenko delivered an important speech. In his speech, Lukashenko comprehensively expounded the most important "big triangle" relationship between China, the United States and Russia in the world today. He praised China, pointed out the mistakes of the United States, and expressed Russia's helplessness and "innocence".
In his speech, Lukashenko said: "The United States at the same time launched a fierce attack on all countries that did not listen to them, realizing that they made a mistake: to unite the disobedient Russia and their main enemy, China." ”
Lukashenko continued: "Unite these two countries – Russia, which is rich in natural resources and a strong military-industrial complex, and China, which has great potential for economic and human resources. They (the United States) only realized that they could not cope with such an alliance. ”
The meaning of Lao Lu's remarks is not difficult to understand, and there are three main levels: First, in the "big triangle" relationship, the United States and China are opponents, while Russia "just doesn't listen to the Americans", which means that it is not an "opponent". Second, the "indiscriminate" pressure exerted by the Americans has led to the unity of China and Russia. Third, China and Russia happen to be two "highly complementary" world powers, so the United States cannot cope with it. The conclusion is this: the United States has not only made mistakes, but also made great mistakes.
Now that it realizes that it has made a mistake, how does the United States "correct" this mistake? Lukashenko also gave an interpretation.
Lukashenko believes that after "Russia and China were united" because of a strategic mistake, the United States found a way to make up for this "mistake", that is: to provoke a conflict in Europe, drag and weaken Russia, thereby freeing up its hands against China.
Lukashenko interpreted: (The United States) is currently creating a conflict in Ukraine and transferring it to the shoulders of the European Union and NATO, promising only financial help. Washington's goal is to distract Russia from the war with Ukraine, weaken Russia through war and sanctions, and deal with China at the same time.
Lukashenko also believes that the US approach to dealing with China and Russia is doomed to failure, so he suggested that the United States should learn from the old China, otherwise, the United States' position on the world political stage will not be guaranteed.
Lukashenko said that "Ukraine is a testing ground, from which the future world pattern will be determined to some extent." This everyone understands that the nuclear powers are fighting against each other, albeit indirectly, in Ukraine. The implication is that the United States and the West cannot win a "war" between the nuclear powers. Since we cannot win this war in Ukraine, which is related to the future pattern of the world, it will be difficult for the United States and the West to maintain their international status.
So, how can the United States ensure that it has its own "place" on the world political stage in the future? "Lu Yuanwai" suggested that the United States should learn from ancient China.
Lukashenko believes that if the United States and the West want to maintain one of the centers of power in the new world order, they should learn from ancient China. This is because the community with a shared future for mankind advocated by China is a model of national unity, without oppression and superiority, without saber rattling, but with the power of wisdom and intelligence.
It has to be said that Lukashenko's exposition of the "big triangle" relationship and his judgment of the international situation can be described as "hitting the nail on the head". The praise of China is also "sincere". Of course, if you taste it carefully, it seems that there are "words in the words".
For example, Lukashenko seems to be emphasizing that Russia does not pose a threat to the United States, and is just "disobedient", but he has been so suppressed by the United States, as if he feels a little "aggrieved" for Russia. Moreover, why did Lao Lu, who has always been "resourceful," specifically expound on the "big triangle" relationship between China, the United States, and Russia after the United States passed the "Ukraine Aid Act" and emphasized that Russia is not an "adversary" of the United States? To put it bluntly, it is a bit puzzling.
For example, it seems that it is a bit "not very hurtful, but extremely insulting" to boast about the "second in the world" country in front of the "world's first" country, and to let the world's first country learn from the world's second country. In that case, under the effect of "rebellious psychology", Lao Mei may deal with us more "do everything".