Xiaoqiao, do you know the law exam?
You know, it is said to be the national "top trilemma" vocational qualification examination 55555
So do you know why it's so hard?
There are a lot of contents, great difficulty, and low pass rate, and I feel that it is second only to CPA..... 55555
Yes, is it not difficult for mainland judges, prosecutors, lawyers, notaries, arbitrators (legal) and those engaged in the review of administrative punishment decisions, administrative reconsideration, and administrative adjudication in government departments to pass the legal professional qualification examination?
Well, I heard that under the condition of meeting the qualifications for the examination, it is necessary to test the rule of law thought, jurisprudence, constitutional law, Chinese legal history, international law, judicial system and legal professional ethics, criminal law, criminal procedure law, administrative law and administrative procedure law, civil law, intellectual property law, commercial law, economic law, environmental resources law, labor and social security law, private international law, international economic law, civil procedure law, etc. 55555.....
Do you want to see what the subjective questions of the law exam are like?
Okay, let me try the debut question!
people
law
The Aries company imported a sports car of a certain luxury brand. Two months later, Zhang Tao signed a sales contract with Jinniu Company, which stipulated that Jinniu Company would sell Zhang Tao a certain luxury brand sports car. Taurus then purchased the car from Aries. Two weeks later, the car arrived at the Taurus Company, which found that the wheel hub of the vehicle was scratched during the inspection, so it was treated and the scratches were repaired. After the vehicle was delivered and the formalities were completed, Zhang Tao found that the car had maintenance records on the Internet, so he sued Taurus and Aries as joint defendants to the court, requesting Taurus and Aries to bear joint and several liability.
issue
Was the court of first instance correct in ruling that Aries was not jointly and severally liable?
three
test
answer
table
That's right. The contractual relationship is relative, and a contract established in accordance with the law is only legally binding on the parties. In this case, Aries Company is not a party to the sales contract and is not bound by the sales contract signed between Taurus Company and Zhang Tao, and Zhang Tao has no right to demand that Aries Company be liable. The court of first instance was correct in ruling that Aries was not jointly and severally liable. The legal basis is Article 465, Paragraph 2 of the Civil Code.
Article 465 of the Civil Code: Contracts established in accordance with law are protected by law.
A contract established in accordance with law shall only be legally binding on the parties, unless otherwise provided by law.
Source: Takahashi Town
Comprehensive editor of the rule of law in Pudong