What some grassroots public officials say and do is really staggering, which is very different from their own identity and completely unworthy of morality. As the saying goes, "the people are afraid of management, not officials," and it is often some grassroots public officials with low professional quality who have some wrong behaviors in handling affairs that can directly and quickly and effectively affect the people's lives and hurt their feelings.
The root cause of this is that the ideology of these grassroots public officials has seriously deviated: they no longer want to be public servants of the people, but want to ride on the heads of the people.
Let's take a look at some recent cases that have had a very bad impact and how much harm has been done to the people.
The common people want to teach the Fa, but the grassroots public officials say that they don't understand the Fa, do they really not understand the Fa, or are they just the Fa?
Recently, several growers in Kailu County were obstructed by the town and village cadres when they were rushing to plant in the spring, on the grounds that "if they don't pay the money, they won't give the seeds" and they had to forcibly detain their cars. During the conflict between farmers and cadres, let's take a look at what these grassroots public officials have done.
- Deputy Director of the Village Committee: He threatened to go to the field to farm if he didn't pay the money, and find 200 people to stop him tomorrow.
- A staff member of the village committee: I don't talk to you about the law, and if you are asked to collect money, I will collect money.
- Deputy Secretary of the Town: I am the Secretary of the Party Committee of Jianhua Town, my surname is Ji, and my name is Ji Yunhao.
- Police station: The public security organ verbally summoned you (the grower), forcibly summoned you, and turned the front of the car around.
Let's roughly analyze the meaning of the words of these grassroots public officials:
- Deputy Director of the Village Committee: If you give money, you can plant, if you don't give money, you can try, I will find 200 people to come and clean you up tomorrow, full of underworld style and style.
- A staff member of the village committee: I don't know what the law is, I will do whatever the boss tells me to do, and I am a little fan under the boss of the underworld. "Collecting money" usually refers to collecting or aggregating money, especially through improper or illegal means.
- Deputy secretary of the town: As soon as he came, he reported his name and identity, and asked the growers if they understood? Obviously, he wanted to use his identity to oppress the people, and he was full of official authority, and he was very domineering that I am the king's law.
- Police station: Shouting loudly, trying to force people to obey with coercion. Let's take a look at the angry questioning of the growers in the video: What kind of police is this, and do you still have the law?
The incident had a bad impact, and the deputy secretary of the town was quickly dismissed from his post and given a serious warning within the party, and the staff of the village committee was given a serious warning within the party. But in the eyes of the people, the punishment is still light, so if such a public official who does not understand the law is not fired, should he continue to use it in another place?
There are also some public officials who have not yet seen the punishment being punished, such as civilian police officers who are on duty. There is another question that has not yet been clarified, the staff of the village committee said that this is the top to let me collect money, who is this referring to, do you want to find out? There is also the suspicion that the deputy secretary of the town has falsified his academic qualifications and performance of his duties, once it is confirmed, is the person who promoted him not knowing, or is there another insider?
This matter cannot end here, and it must be investigated clearly and given an explanation to the government and the people.
If the problem cannot be solved, then the person who raised the problem should be solved, and this has become the consistent style of some cadres.
Recently, a woman in Kunshan, Suzhou, posted on a social platform: A few days ago, due to the sudden increase in the cost of natural gas in her home, I hope that the relevant departments will conduct a thorough investigation, and the local Suzhou natural gas company will find the lady and come to the door to inspect and explain.
The results of the examination confirmed that the lady's watch jumped too fast, the woman said that the attitude of the natural gas company was very good, she thought that this was the end of the matter, but what made her feel afraid was that first, two police officers from the district came to promote the knowledge of telecommunications anti-fraud, and asked the name of the woman's husband's company, and then the functional department personnel found her husband's company, and the company boss communicated with her husband, hoping that she could delete the post.
The woman posted a description: She is just a small citizen, she just told what happened to her, did not lie and create rumors, and hoped that the relevant departments would let her go, and not through the pressure of her husband's company boss to delete the post.
The reason for this is that "the government and enterprises collude and the officials protect each other, and there is a relationship of interest". There have been a number of incidents of leaking information about whistleblowers, resulting in retaliation against whistleblowers. What's more, some officials also participated in threatening the whistleblower with the people around the whistleblower, using the people around the whistleblower to threaten the whistleblower, making the whistleblower a "sinner" for relatives and friends, and finally having to give up the report, and really grasping the weaknesses of the common people.
Do not admit the mistake of law enforcement, cold reply: If the public does not agree with the handling, they can conduct administrative reconsideration or administrative litigation.
On April 9, Mr. Wang rode his bicycle home from work and was fined 50 yuan by the traffic police for not having a license plate on his bicycle. Mr. Wang couldn't help but ask: Bicycles also need to be licensed? The traffic police on duty replied to him: What kind of car does not have a license plate on the road? Even the shared bicycles have a steel seal.
Mr. Wang said that the day after the incident, she called the 12345 government service convenience hotline to report the problem, and the staff of the vehicle management office clearly replied: according to the "Jiangsu Provincial Road Traffic Safety Regulations" implemented on January 1 this year, bicycles do not need to be licensed. Later, a staff member of the traffic police asked for his ID number, saying that he would help him check it, and then there was no news.
In response to this situation, the staff of the First Brigade of the Traffic Management Bureau of the Nanjing Municipal Public Security Bureau responded that if the public does not agree with the handling, they can carry out administrative reconsideration or administrative litigation.
Arbitrary law enforcement, excessive law enforcement, rough law enforcement, and erroneous law enforcement emerge one after another, and anyway, they have little impact on law enforcers, and it is the common people who are being enforced that suffer. They don't know how to defend their rights and are afraid of defending their rights, and they will be punished if they are punished. If you ask them to go for administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, do the people know where to go and do they have time and energy to waste?
Obviously, the relevant departments have made a mistake in enforcing the law, and they have admitted it, but why can't they take the initiative to cancel the punishment of the common people? How arrogant and hooliganistic is this attitude?
It is recommended to implement the last elimination mechanism for grassroots public officials to improve their professional quality!
Recently, in some places, a mechanism for the elimination of teachers at the bottom has been introduced, which is also necessary for public officials. If the "rice bowl" is too stable, it is not conducive to progress, and it is easy to raise mediocre people. Grassroots public officials who have seriously deviated from their ideology should be dismissed directly, because there is no shortage of talents to serve the people in the country, but opportunities. There are so many people who take the public examination every year, I don't know what is the use of keeping these black sheep.
Water can carry a boat, but it can also capsize a boat!
The feelings of the common people are the simplest, who is good to them and who is bad to them, they have a scale in their hearts, and we must not let these black sheep hurt the feelings of the people anymore.