On the 23rd, the reporter who focused on agriculture and agriculture went to the farmland in Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, and found that the people who blocked it were gone, and Kailu County had explicitly forbidden anyone to block agricultural machinery from going to the ground, and all of this was thanks to the great strength of netizens! The deputy director of the Propaganda Department of the Kailu County Party Committee also responded to the incident, saying that no one would stop it, but the new contract fee would continue to be discussed and handled. The old farmer smiled happily for the time being, and for the farmer, the land could be cultivated more than anything else.
Although this land can be cultivated, the new contract fee has not yet been resolved, and the controversy over this issue is still very big! There are roughly two situations, the first is that some people think that the contractors and old farmers are also at fault, and it is normal to turn the grassland into cultivated land, and it is normal to make up the contract fee, and the other is to deny it, thinking that it should not be the old farmers who give the new fees, and that what the contract is signed is what it is, but whenever someone comes out and says that the old farmers are at fault, there will be a large number of netizens who come out and scold, saying that it is the government's water army. For example, a netizen said that the old farmer had cleared the land, and there was nothing wrong with the village cadres asking for supplementary fees, and there was a lot of scolding immediately underground.
And China's three rural media account reporters also broke the new news, these wasteland is in 2018 after the Kailu County Government in the land three adjustments, requiring the old farmers to cut the grass in the field to plant corn land, planting corn can also get the government's grain subsidies, that is to say, the government encourages land reclamation, so why not make the cost clear before the reclamation?
Let's take a look at the current situation of thousands of acres of land in Kailu, all of which are corn stalks, and all of them can only be planted with corn, which is required by the government.
Looking at the appearance of the wasteland 20 years ago, according to the old farmer's description, that place was a place where rabbits did not, not a single grass grows, and when cattle walked past, it was a puddle and a saline-alkali land! Not to mention farming, even if it was thrown away on land that no one wanted, it was definitely not the "grassland" that the village cadres said. They are willing to contract is also a big risk, it took more than ten years of hard work to improve the soil, just started planting hopefully, was blocked from adding money, illegal and unreasonable!
And the reason why this matter is so big, and why the village officials and the government dare to let farmers pay new fees, is all because of Article 533 of the Civil Code mentioned in the mouth of Ji Yunhao, a member of the Political and Legal Committee. Regarding this provision, Ji Yunhao can be said to be like a stream, and the current situation of the land is that the land has changed, and the fees paid by the contractor have seriously affected the interests of the other party.
The funniest thing is the answer of the village official secretary, he thinks that the land has now become irrigated land, and new fees will be charged, the reporter asked why they have the right to take back the land that is still in the contract period, the village official secretary said that the land is theirs, of course it can be recovered, it can be said that he is old and does not understand the law, but there are people who understand the law.
The doctor of law directly taught the village officials what it means to "understand the law"; if the land in their mouth is changed from grassland to water, they will have to charge an additional fee, and they have also moved out of the civil code, so the civil code also says that staff members cannot use their authority to interfere in rural land contracts or change or terminate contracts, so why don't they obey them? There is also the most important article: During the contract period, the contract issuing party is not allowed to take back the contracted land. The doctor of law said that these lands were all painstakingly improved by other contractors and a group of old farmers, and were not created by the natural environment, nor were they caused by changes in state policies, and they did not meet the requirements of collecting new fees from other people. After listening to the analysis of the doctor of law, I feel that the old farmers of the contractor are not afraid of even lawsuits, and justice is always there!