laitimes

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

author:See what's going on in the world

Loading...

Text: See

Edit|World Affairs

Imagine waking up and being asked to shell out nearly a million extra dollars in your bag. This is not a robbery, this is a dispute over a supplementary contract fee for 5,000 mu of land! The peasants in Kailu County thought that they only needed to farm until 2034 according to the contract, but they were suddenly told that they still had to pay another 200 yuan per mu! This is not like the classic line in the movie "Gone with the Wind": Tomorrow is another day, but the bill is coming today! Is it extenuating or vexatious? Let's reveal the secret behind this.

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

Back in 2004, the now controversial 5,000 acres of land was just a desolate saline land. The local farmers signed a contract with the village and town government, the contract period is 30 years, and the fee has been paid twice, with a total amount of 158,000 yuan, equivalent to only 0.94 yuan per mu per year - this price, even a pack of spicy noodles can not be bought!

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

Time flies, and the land turns from waste to gold. After more than 10 years of hard work and a large amount of input from farmers, the original saline-alkali land has miraculously become fertile watered land. Who would have thought that this "magical" land would suddenly have to increase the contracting fee again. The sudden notice was no less than a thunderbolt from the sky, and the farmers were confused, and their hearts were full of confusion and anger.

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

The reason for the additional fee is the change in the nature of the land. Village and town officials pointed out that the change of land requires additional management costs, and that land is now more valuable than it was back then. It sounds plausible, but on second thought, does this argument really hold water? Isn't the farmer farming a loss-making business?

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

The deputy director of the village committee explained without blushing or heartbeat: "Your land was originally wasteland, but now it has become watered land, and it is much more fertile, so you have to pay an extra 200 yuan per mu for watering the land, and if you don't pay it, don't think about planting!" The implication is that the appreciation of this land is entirely due to the village committee? In the face of the peasants' dissatisfaction and doubts, the deputy director not only did not explain, but emboldened the threat: "What can I do when 110 comes?" This sentence can't help but make people feel a chill, and the dignity of the law and the rights and interests of farmers seem to become fluttering here.

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

It must be mentioned here that Ji Yunhao, a cadre, may be the biggest victim. On the one hand, the pressure from the superiors, and on the other hand, the dissatisfaction of the peasants, they finally climbed to the position of deputy secretary, but they became infamous because of a land dispute. He did say, "I don't know the Fa," and perhaps this is not ignorance, but a kind of helpless self-deprecation. After Ji Yunhao was dismissed, the problem was not solved, but became more complicated.

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

On social media, the dispute is like a tsunami. There are those who stand in solidarity with the farmers, arguing that they are hard cultivators and should not be charged extra. Others believe that the reversal of events shows that cadres are also victims of the system. The war in the comment area cannot be quelled for a while, everyone has their own position, but there is only one common focus: fairness and justice.

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

Just like the debate in the movie "The Twelve Angry Men", everyone's point of view represents their position and interests. The controversy over the additional contract fee is not only a question of money, but also a battle of trust, law and morality. Regardless of the final outcome, it is hoped that everyone's rights will be respected and that every labor will be duly rewarded.

The supplementary contract fee should really be paid? The 5,000-mu contract fee was exposed, and the cadres were wronged?

In this feast of the land, every character cannot be ignored and every voice is worth listening to. And we, as bystanders, should perhaps think more about how all this is happening today will affect our future social form. What do you think? Feel free to leave your views in the comment area to make this discussion richer and more diverse?