Recently, at a time when cross-strait relations have continued to be tense, the mainland has revised its wording toward Taiwan, and this is manifested in the fact that the core of the '92 Consensus has been expanded from the original one China to one country and one nation, which also indicates that the mainland has expanded the scope of Taiwan's return to the motherland, and it can be regarded as an opportunity and signal for Taiwan independence released to Lai Qingde and other DPPs.
Loading...
This expanded scope means that Taiwan can be given more autonomy in the future, and it is not impossible to retain the original political party and army. As long as the Taiwan authorities abandon the idea of opposing Taiwan independence and establish a norm for sustained cross-strait dialogue, then the mainland will not only stop counterattacking Taiwan, but even the reservations of Taiwan's political parties and political system will not be impossible to discuss.
However, for this opportunity, the Taiwan authorities obviously chose to go the dark way, they presented a so-called poll, showing that the majority of the people do not agree, and then issued data on the people's support for the party, in order to prove that they are the mainstream ideas in Taiwan.
However, it is not known how credible this data is, after all, most of Taiwan's high-level leaders are held by the green battalion, and it is not difficult to modify the means through some shady scenes.
In addition, in the face of the mainland's goodwill, the Taiwan authorities did not even have the courage to face it directly, and they once again played the word game they had always played, neither rejecting nor accepting it, but instead throwing out a so-called public opinion poll that they did not even know how much credibility they had when asked, and throwing the pot of antagonism and confrontation on the heads of the Taiwan people.
In addition to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which has gone all the way to the black, Taiwan's other political party, the Kuomintang, is also worth mentioning for its goodwill toward the mainland.
As a party native of the mainland, the Kuomintang (KMT), which has been encircled and suppressed by the DPP in recent years, has long lost its bottom line; although the mainstream attitude of their party is not as stubborn as that of the DPP, it is definitely not very positive, and the only difference between them and the DPP is that the KMT is more inclined to maintain the status quo.
This can also be seen in the successive leaders of the Kuomintang, and although the Kuomintang has not interrupted cross-strait exchanges in the past few years, it has always avoided talking about the reunification. However, after the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took away the status of the ruling party of the Kuomintang by relying on the odd card of Taiwan independence, there were also considerable differences within the KMT, such as Zhu Lilun, who was clearly pro-US and refused to recognize the '92 consensus, and there were also those who used the mainland to build momentum for themselves.
This can be seen from the core point of the KMT's revision of the '92 consensus on the mainland, and in the face of the mainland's revised '92 consensus, Zhang Yazhong within the Kuomintang believes that the '92 consensus should be revised again, and a brand-new '92 consensus should be shaped in combination with the KMT's new understanding of the '92 consensus in the later period.
However, the problem is that as the mainland once again revises the '92 consensus, this point can be regarded as the minimum requirement for return, and basically it is enough to ask the Taiwan authorities to recognize the origin of their identity and stop forcefully confronting them, but the Kuomintang side has changed this demand again and again, saying on the one hand that it recognizes the '92 consensus, and on the other hand, saying that it needs to continue to discuss the understanding of the '92 consensus.
However, this is also the consistent routine of the Kuomintang, and the only difference between them and the DPP is that the KMT's attitude is relatively soft, giving a seemingly open discussion, but in fact the essence of the KMT is not much different from that of the DPP, except that it will not engage in a tough confrontation with the mainland.
Now that the political position of the Kuomintang in Taiwan is in jeopardy, and a large number of seats are controlled by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), and the once largest party in Taiwan has become the current state, it can only be said that the Kuomintang is to blame; if it were not for the KMT's ambiguous diplomatic attitude, how could it have been ousted from power by the DPP, which supports Taiwan independence? It is precisely because of this attitude of the KMT that it has also been ousted from power on both sides of Taiwan without pleasing it; if the KMT continues to engage in a vague attitude and play left and right, then the day of abandonment will not be far away.