laitimes

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

author:A small world of entertainment

The Kailu blocking of spring ploughing incident has ushered in a new reversal, no wonder Ji Yunhao pointed at the contractor and said that they were robbing the collective land. I really didn't blame them at all, just look at the evidence exposed.

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

The date of the first contract was signed in 2004, which indicated that the contractor Zhang rented the land for dairy farming, and the area of cultivation was also clearly written, only 110 acres of land, and the remaining more than 5,000 acres of land could not be cultivated, but could only raise cattle. Therefore, it was the contractor Zhang who first violated the regulations and changed the business scope of the land without permission.

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

In addition, the details of the receipt were also exposed, the date of the charge was 2022, but the fees charged were from 2018 to 2020, which means that the contractor Zhang used the land first and then paid the money, and did not pay it after delay. We all know that no matter what you rent, you have to pay a deposit and pay rent in advance before you can have the right to use it. It can be said that the government is quite tolerant of Zhang's delay in paying rent. Looking at the amount for two years, 6 million, 3 million a year, that is to say, the rent of more than 5,000 mu of land a month is 250,000, and one mu of land is only about 54 yuan a month, which can be said to be quite cheap.

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

After the incident became a big problem, the Kailu County Government quickly responded, and the notice on the 23rd made it clear that there was no problem with the new contracting fee, and many people paid it, only some large contractors did not pay. This caused a commotion and did not cooperate with the policy, which means that Lao Zhang was the one who took the lead in violating the regulations.

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

Ji Yunhao, the three leading cadres involved in the handling of the incident, was dismissed from their posts, and the other two were warned, so why would the town mayor be fine? Because the collection of new contract fees was issued by the county, many peasant households paid the money, and some small peasant households paid 70,000 yuan. Only the big farmers were dragging their feet and taking the lead in coaxing, and the three cadres were inappropriate in their words in dealing with the problem, and there was nothing wrong with the town mayor directly proposing that they report the case and go through the legal process in the face of the dispute between the big contractor and the village cadres.

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!
The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

And why Lao Zhang, these big contractors, are so anxious and take the lead, not only because the spring ploughing will go over immediately, but also because they have already bought seeds and fertilizers, and also hired workers, these are the costs that have been put in, more than 10,000 yuan per acre of land. It can be said that these big households also need to bear the consequences, and the land is clearly written that there are only 110 acres, and you abuse 4,650 acres, and it is also correct for people to let you add new fees, and you can not farm the land after paying the money? Or is it okay to only cultivate 110 acres?

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

Regarding the behavior of the contractor Lao Zhang, netizens also felt that it was really not unfair to be blocked, and they should actually rewrite the contract and renegotiate the price when they changed the use of the land. It's not right to beat this "old farmer" and sell it miserably, millions of rents a year are taken out, where is the misery?

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!
The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!

Ji Yunhao, who was dismissed, was not wronged, he was born in 1990 and joined the army in 2007, when he was only 17 years old, but his resume was a university degree. Some people say that he can attend college when he is a soldier, but the introduction says that he only served as a soldier for two years before changing jobs, so when he came to study in college? Public opinion was the first to attack him, and his underwear was almost stripped off by netizens, and his dismissal was really a fate that he couldn't escape.

The big farmer took the lead in violating the policy, and many violations were exposed, and it was not unjust to be blocked!