The two steps that Kailu County took out to walk are not good.
Collecting money by yourself and sending out briefings by yourself is not convincing
Kailu County reacted quickly, the first day the network fermented, and the next day Anmin announced: There is indeed such a thing, and the fees stipulated by the county are justified.
Kailu County is the party concerned, and the case should be investigated and handled by the higher-level government.
The deputy secretary of the town was quickly dismissed because he was simple and rude when it came to collecting fees.
Qualitative error.
The crux of this incident lies in the fact that "no money is paid and no planting" is tantamount to sabotaging spring plowing and production, which is a criminal offense.
No matter how you put it, three words: money is troublesome
1. Don't pay money, don't let seeds. If you pay the money, you can grow it any way.
Money trouble, right?
2. The reason why the village, town, and public security treat the peasants roughly, because there is a sword above, and there are indicators to see the progress of the charge, which is why there is an operation of "not paying money and not allowing planting".
Money trouble!
After the peasants signed the contract, they have handed over the relevant payments in accordance with the provisions of the contract, and then added 200 yuan per mu, and the 5,000 mu of land operated by multi-family farmers cooperatively paid 1 million yuan, which is not a small amount.
It's still money!
The crux of the question is: Is it reasonable to charge fees in Kailu County?
Farmers may refuse to pay on the grounds that the "Law of the People's Republic of China on Rural Land Contracting" clearly stipulates that state organs and their functionaries shall not use their authority to interfere in rural land contracts or to change or terminate contracts. In this case, it was Kailu County, a subordinate of a state organ that "used its powers", to "change" the contract.
On the contrary, the basis given by Kailu County is unreasonable.
Before the farmer contracted, the land was identified as grassland in the second survey of land resources, and then the third survey was cultivated land, and the nature of the land changed because of the survey, so it was necessary to charge a fee?
How did the peasants turn grassland into cultivated land? The peasants invested a lot of manpower, material, and financial resources in order to produce more grain, how much subsidy did the county give? Where did the subsidies from the state go?
If the farmer is subsidized and gets the subsidy, he is now asked to pay 200 yuan, which is okay.
If you don't get it, there's no such thing at all, it's unreasonable!
When things go wrong, there must be demons
1. Turning sand land into fertile land should be rewarded by sand control heroes, which is worth promoting;
2. Unauthorized change of land use: Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, sideline fisheries, and fishery are thriving, and agriculture, farmers, and farmers have not changed;
3. When the contract expires, the fee can be increased, and then whoever wants to rent will rent, for example, I rent someone's house, and I can take my own things after the expiration, because it is renting, so it is not worth investing.
However, as land and real estate, the sea has become mulberry fields, and the village collective, as the real owner of the land, can add money, but must subsidize it.
There is a contract beforehand, there is no subsidy during the event, no subsidy afterwards, and the reverse post?
Immersion! Irrational!
If it was a contract signed at the beginning, it is unreasonable to collect money now.
If it is a lease contract at the beginning, it will lose its legal effect in 20 years, and it should be re-signed instead of paying 200 yuan.
In short, it is impossible for Kailu County to solve this case by relying on a briefing, because it does not make sense.
Power or Law?
Local law is superior to national law?
Farmers all over China have signed contracts, why did something happen in Kailu County?