The peasants have increased their grain production by improving the land, which is a great joy for the village committee, but in Shuangsheng Village, Kailu County, Inner Mongolia, the first thing the leaders think of is to charge the peasants.
According to a report from China's agriculture, agriculture and agriculture, 20 years ago, in Shuangsheng Village, there were nearly 6,000 acres of saline-alkali land idle, and Lao Zhang said that this land did not even pull rabbits back then, and no one was willing to rent it for 5 yuan per mu.
However, Lao Zhang and two other villagers from the same village took over the saline-alkali land, which according to the contract showed that the wasteland totaled 5,600 acres, and the contract showed that they used the land to build cattle farms and engage in animal husbandry.
No one expected that after Lao Zhang and his family cared for this land with cow dung and fungus fertilizer for 20 years, the once saline-alkali land was improved into a fertile land that can grow food.
However, a few people were not happy for a few years, and the village committee took a notice to collect the money.
According to the standard of 200 yuan per mu in the notice, Lao Zhang had to pay millions of contracting fees to the village, which made him puzzled: the contracting fees had been paid in full, where did the 1 million come from?
In this regard, the village secretary said that at the beginning, the villagers covered the grassland, but now it has become watered land, and now they have to make up the cost of watering the land.
Secretary Yang also revealed that the money was collected by the town, and if it was not paid, the contract would be terminated, and the contractor did not agree or not.
It's so unreasonable.
When the reporter said that it was completely unreasonable to do this, Secretary Yang smiled and said that he didn't understand the law.
The attitude of the village committee is clear, and the deputy director of the village will resolutely implement Secretary Yang's attitude to the end.
When the contracted farmer starts the cultivator, he will be the first to stop it, and even say that he will bring 200 people to see the land, and take shifts day and night, when Lao Li will pay the money and when he can farm the land.
Even more speechless, following the deputy director of the village, the deputy SJ of the town's party committee also came to the scene to stop farming, as a post-90s leader, Secretary Ji's strong tone is stronger, pointing fingers at a group of old farmers, very majestic.
What's even more ridiculous is that when several old farmers had conflicts over farming and went to Secretary Ji for mediation, Secretary Ji pushed himself away, saying that he didn't understand the law.
When encountering problems, they do not take action, prevaricate the peasants with "not understanding the law", and when they ask the peasants for money, they have more ideas than the other, and this kind of leader should go to the debt collection company to find a class, and do not occupy the pit and do not pull it.
As soon as the village cadres blocked the spring ploughing, several cadres involved were criticized by netizens, but objectively speaking, this matter needs to be viewed from two perspectives.
First of all, from the contractor's point of view, this million is too wronged, he has obviously paid enough for 30 years of contract fees in advance, and he has spent huge manpower and material resources to raise it day by day, and he has a contract in hand, so he can say that he can go anywhere.
From ZF's point of view, the village committee leased out the grassland, and the contract clearly stated that it was used for dairy farming, which means that the nature of the land was aquaculture, but Lao Li and the others changed the use of the land after contracting the land, which is called a change in the nature of the land, and it is also reasonable to let them pay the land use fee.
The only contradiction between the two sides is that the land has been improved by the contractor, and the village committee and the town are just sitting back and enjoying the results, so they cannot look at the problem according to the general rules.
If it is said that this land is reclaimed by village cadres and the town, even if it is tens of millions from farmers, netizens support it.
But the problem lies in the fact that the village committee did not help or stop the peasants when they cleared the land, let alone mention the need to make up money after the change in the nature of the land.
I thought that this matter would ferment for a few more days, but I didn't expect Kailu County ZF to soon issue a briefing.
In the briefing, a total of three things were answered for everyone,
First, the supplementary collection of contract fees is in accordance with the "three adjustments of national territory", and there is no nonsense.
Second, it is the farmers who have already paid the fees to prevent them from planting, and they are hindered from turning the land because of the desire to compare, and after mediation, these people will take the form of litigation to solve the problem in the future.
Third, the town leaders who played official power were dismissed, and two village cadres were warned.
What is revealed behind this notice has been very clear, villages and towns will not make a big deal out of the contract fee just like that, and the leaders who are punished are because of their arrogant and rude work style.
In fact, ZF really wants to solve this matter perfectly, I think there are still a lot of ways, after all, people can't let urine suffocate to death, and ZF is also to protect the rights and interests of farmers, in the final analysis, everyone is still together.
If there is no emotion, it is the fairest way for the two sides to have a dialogue in court and let the law judge who is right and who is wrong.
However, from a reasonable point of view, in fact, there is an optimal plan for this matter, that is, the employer first breaches the contract and then signs the contract, that is, the employer pays the contract fee in accordance with the provisions of the contract, and the contractor has the right to contract the land first after the contract is terminated, and can re-contract it back at the price of watered land again.
Since neither side wants to make concessions, this is the most compromise option.
The last one is that the jar is broken, and the contractor does not use the rich land, but continues to work on the land for aquaculture until the contract expires.
These methods seem to be stronger than the village cadres and town cadres blocking the planting on the spot, judging from the video, several old farmers of the contractor are not unreasonable people, if you persuade them with good words, I believe that this matter will not come to this point, what do you say?