Since Scholz returned home, his attitude on the issue of the Russia-Ukraine conflict has changed significantly. He no longer referred to proposals for resolving the conflict, but turned his attention to his own political interests. This approach is disappointing because it ignores the importance of conflict resolution and instead prioritizes political interests over humanitarian and national interests.
Scholz's transformation after returning to China may be due to the political pressure and internal contradictions he faced. At home, he may face pressure from different political factions, which makes it difficult for him to stand his ground on foreign policy. In addition, he may also be concerned that his stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict will trigger a domestic backlash and affect his political position.
However, as the leader of a country, Scholz should have the courage to stand up for his principles and positions. Resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict is essential for peace and stability in Europe and the world. As an important European country, Germany should play a constructive role in actively participating in conflict resolution. Scholz should propose concrete solutions to promote dialogue and reconciliation between the parties to the conflict, rather than putting his own political interests above the peace and prosperity of mankind.
In addition, Scholz's silence on the Russia-Ukraine conflict has raised questions about his leadership. A country's leaders should have firm will and wise judgment, and be able to safeguard the country's interests and image in a complex international environment. However, Scholz's performance on his return home has been disappointing, and he does not seem to be capable of playing an active role in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, choosing instead to put his own political interests first.
Such an approach would not only be unhelpful in resolving the Russia-Ukraine conflict, but could also exacerbate already tense situations. If Scholz continues to ignore the importance of conflict resolution and focus only on his own political interests, he will lose support and trust at home and abroad, and have a negative impact on Germany's international image.
To sum up, Scholz's attitude on the issue of the Russia-Ukraine conflict after returning home is disappointing. As a leader of a country, he should have the courage to stand up to his principles and positions, actively participate in resolving conflicts, and maintain peace and prosperity for mankind. We hope that Scholz will re-examine his position, face the Russia-Ukraine conflict with a responsible attitude, and make a positive contribution to the resolution of the conflict.