Loading...
Recently, a news item in Kailu County, Tongliao City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, has aroused the attention of all sectors of society: Farmers are blocked by village and town cadres during the spring ploughing season, and they are not allowed to cultivate land without paying fees. This incident involved the livelihood and rights of farmers, and caused widespread controversy and heated discussions.
Spring ploughing season is a busy season for farmers, and in Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Town, Kailu County, Tongliao City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, a controversy related to spring ploughing has quietly occurred. The peasants reported that village and town cadres prevented them from farming in the fields and demanded that they pay the so-called "supplementary contract fee" or they would not be allowed to farm.
Loading...
In this controversy, the farmers made their voices heard. They said that they had contracted the land under the contract and paid the contract fee on time, but this year they were asked to pay additional fees or they would not be allowed to cultivate the land. This made them feel confused and aggrieved, and they also expressed dissatisfaction and doubts about the behavior of village and town cadres.
In Shuangsheng Village, Jianhua Township, Kailu County, Master Zhang, a farmer, recalls that he contracted a piece of sand marsh land in 2004 and started growing crops after improvements. However, this year, it is facing the dilemma of villages and towns requiring a fee of 200 yuan per mu of land. In this regard, Master Zhang and other farmers have paid all the contract fees according to the contract, but the villages and towns have demanded to pay the fees again, resulting in them being unable to cultivate the land.
A similar situation occurred in the town of Xiaojieji in Kailu County. According to a farmer, he subcontracted the moorland in 2014 and improved it to grow corn, and he paid the contract fee in one lump sum. However, this year, the village asked them to pay 200 yuan per mu of land, and he paid 70,000 yuan. The village said it was because the marshes had been converted to cultivated land, but the farmers were confused and dissatisfied.
This incident exposed the problems existing in rural grassroots governance: the lack of a transparent decision-making mechanism and the protection of farmers' legitimate rights and interests. Farmers are still facing demands for additional costs even after legally paying contract fees, which damages their rights and interests. At the same time, the behavior of some village and town cadres has also aroused doubts and reflection in society.
The attitude of the peasants towards the land can be described as an attachment and responsibility, and they have invested a lot of time and energy in improving the land, but they are faced with the dilemma of being forced to pay additional fees, which makes them feel angry and helpless. Village and town cadres may have acted out of some interests, but they should be aware of the serious impact on farmers' livelihoods and emotions.
Regarding the behavior of village and town cadres, Kailu County issued a circular saying that the "supplementary contract fee" collected was a paid use fee for the newly added cultivated land, but at the same time, it also admitted that individual grassroots cadres had an improper attitude towards the masses and had been dealt with accordingly.
This incident has triggered people's thinking about farmers' rights and grassroots governance. Farmers have invested a lot of time and effort in improving their land, but they are forced to pay extra fees. This is not only a dispute over land use rights, but also a major event related to the livelihood and interests of farmers.
This incident reflects some of the problems that still exist in rural grassroots governance: the lack of a transparent and fair decision-making mechanism, and the improper attitude of village and town cadres towards the masses. In order to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the peasants, it is necessary to establish a more standardized and effective supervisory mechanism to ensure that the actions of village and town cadres are lawful and fair, and that they truly seek the interests of the peasants.
For farmers, the land is the foundation of their life and survival, and it is their food and clothing. In the face of sudden expense requirements, they feel helpless and angry, and they are also trying to protect their rights and interests. For some grassroots cadres, it may be out of various interests that they have taken such actions, but they should also be aware that such actions have a serious impact on the livelihood and mood of farmers.
This incident is not only a dispute over land use rights, but also an issue related to farmers' livelihoods and grassroots governance. While safeguarding the rights and interests of peasants, it is also necessary to supervise and restrain grassroots cadres to ensure that their actions are lawful and fair, and to seek well-being for peasants.
What do you think about this, please share your opinion, thank you!
Work Statement: The content is taken from the Internet, if there is any infringement, contact to delete!