The stumbling sister killed the violent man,
Why is it not justifiable self-defense?
Text | The fog is full of barrage
（01）
Sister Meng, a native of Guangxi.
At the age of 41, he is middle-aged.
Alas, people are not as good as dogs in middle age, and they work hard to survive and walk around.
Sister Meng went to Chongqing to "talk about business".
What kind of business are you talking about?
At 2 p.m. on October 20, 2023, Sister Meng was waiting for a "customer" in an alley.
A 49-year-old man came to negotiate the price with Sister Meng.
After the negotiation, Sister Meng took the man to her rental house, undressed loosely, and could not be described.
Therefore, the 41-year-old Sister Meng is engaged in a career of skin and flesh...... Alas, life is sometimes so bitter.
Indescribable process, the man asks for a "kiss on the mouth".
Poop one, OK?
Sister Meng was not happy.
Rejected?
The man was furious.
Bang, bang, the man beat Sister Meng's head with his fist.
Bang bang, the man slapped the eldest sister wildly.
...... Poor Sister Meng, whose daughter is she? And which child's mother? Life has sunk to this point, and she has been beaten madly by violent men.
The man sprees for 3 or 4 minutes.
3 minutes is 180 seconds, and 4 minutes is 240 seconds. According to the median value, that is 210 seconds, calculated by one punch or one slap per second, during this time, Sister Meng was punched 210 times, or 210 slaps.
You try slapping yourself 210 times.
It's no wonder if you can't smoke it.
Pumping to this extent, the next door couldn't listen anymore, and knocked on the door to persuade him: stop fighting, if you beat again, you will kill someone.
The man stopped, walked out of the room, and stood in the street and continued to curse.
Then the man rushed back and kicked Sister Meng down.
And shout: I'm going to kill you!
At this moment, Sister Meng got up from the ground and took out the knife.
Fruit knives.
A stunning knife pierced the left chest of a violent man.
The man pulled out the knife from his body and wanted to stab Sister Meng back.
But he "didn't move much."
I don't have the strength anymore.
The man fell to the ground.
Death.
（02）
The police came and looked, hey, the man is dead.
Then go through the process.
In court, Sister Meng's lawyer generously stated: This is legitimate defense.
The court held that: "Meng chose to use a knife to directly stab Zheng (the man) in the vital parts, and the defensive act clearly exceeded the necessary limit to stop the unlawful infringement. ”
So Sister Meng was sentenced to 4 years in prison:
4 years is 4 years.
A 41-year-old woman, with no job or job, sells her body, and is endless, it is better to be in prison and have a good place for breakfast and lunch.
But then again, you have been locked up for 4 years, and she was 45 years old when she came out, and she couldn't even find a buyer to sell her body, so how could she be embarrassed?
But there is one thing to say, saying that Sister Meng's anti-killing of violent men is excessive defense, and professionals have different opinions.
（03）
When it comes to legitimate defense, the most familiar one is the 2018 Kunshan anti-murder case of Brother Long:
Brother Long, the big brother of society.
chased and killed the honest man with a knife, but with a bang, the knife fell to the ground.
The other party picked up the knife and fought back, poof, Brother Long's life, drew a small period.
The person who slashed Brother Long was judged by the court to be justified and did not bear criminal responsibility.
The case was a sensation.
However, if this case is handed over to the court that sentenced Sister Meng to 4 years, I am afraid that the court will swallow the person who killed Brother Long, and it may not be judged as legitimate defense.
Brother Long's knife fell to the ground, but it was picked up by the other party - according to some people's opinions, at this time, the person who picked up the knife no longer faces a threat to his life, and he still uses a knife to cut Brother Long, how can this be?
Are you also worthy of cutting Brother Long?
Just as the court accused Sister Meng, "Meng chose to use a knife to directly stab Zheng (the man) in the vital parts, and the defensive behavior obviously exceeded the necessary limit to stop the illegal infringement" This paragraph is not human words at all, completely ignoring that Sister Meng has been frantically beaten by the other party for 3 or 4 minutes, and the other party rushed in and kicked Sister Meng down, Sister Meng's reaction was completely biological instinct, where did the "choice" come from?
She was just stunned, grabbed the knife and stabbed indiscriminately, where did she choose?
The Tribunal's use of the highly subjective word "choice" distorts the facts and obscures the truth.
So, why does the court refuse to administer justice for Sister Meng?
Why?
（04）
There are two kinds of facts:
One is the truth.
One is subjective speculation.
The man beat Sister Meng frantically for 3 or 4 minutes, then rushed into the house from the outside, kicked Sister Meng to the ground, and Sister Meng grabbed a fruit knife in panic and stabbed the violent man in the left chest - this is a fact.
Sister Meng is holding a fruit knife in her hand, she can use the knife to stab a man's arm, she can stab a man's thigh, she can cut a man's buttocks, and she can also pull a man's double eyelids, but there are so many options that Sister Meng just didn't choose, she had to aim at the man's left chest, poof, stabbed it in, and took the man's life - this is subjective speculation.
In fact, Sister Meng, who had lost her footing, had no choice.
Her choice came from the subjective imagination of those people in the court.
According to the thinking of the court where Sister Meng is located, Kunshan should not kill Brother Long, because Brother Long's knife fell to the ground and you pick it up, then you have a million choices, you can choose to cut Brother Long's arm, you can choose to cut Brother Long's legs, and cut Brother Long's ass, but you just chose to kill Brother Long, which is really unusual.
Everyone came to the courtroom to "find a place to reason".
But this reason, some people rely on facts, and some people rely on their own subjective conjectures.
When encountering a subjective and conjectural court, there is really no curse to recite.
Sister Meng's case was reported by the media, because everyone felt that Sister Meng was too wronged to be imprisoned, she obviously had no choice, and a group of weirdos in the court said that you had it, and they won the quarrel, they said that you did not respect them and wanted to send you to prison. If you can't win them, you have to go to jail, it's a real headache to think about.
2,500 years ago, Zigong, a student of Confucius, said: The evil of a gentleman is inferior, and all the evil in the world will be returned.
It means that people cannot fall to the bottom. Once you fall to the bottom, you will be bullied by all the bad guys. Sister Rumeng, she has fallen to this point, and some people beat her violently, if she doesn't fight back, she will be killed, and if she fights back, she will have to go to prison, how miserable is this?
I hope that more people can have a little "empathy" rationality, don't replace facts with subjective speculation, give the bottom a little chance, and give the world a little justice, this is the world's greatest expectation of the judicial system.
(*The picture in this article is from the Internet)