University professors should be the elite of society, and their words and deeds are influencing and influencing the decisions and actions of many people. Therefore, as a university professor, you must be cautious when speaking in public. You know, when you say a word, it looks light, but spitting can become a nail, which is a thing that must be highly valued.
Recently, Professor Yan Xuetong of Tsinghua University's School of International Relations made a striking point in a lecture: In some war situations, the shortcut to peace may be that one side chooses to surrender voluntarily. The implication of his remark is that surrender is the fastest way to maintain peace.
Isn't this a hymn of surrender? It's surprising. Is this coming out of the mouth of a university professor? Or is it a well-known scholar, and it's hard to believe.
Yan Xuetong, born on December 7, 1952 in Tianjin, is an international relations theorist, a senior professor of liberal arts at Tsinghua University, a foreign academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and the dean of the Institute of International Relations at Tsinghua University. His research focuses on the rise of great powers, the development of the international situation, China's foreign policy, international relations theory, scientific research methods, and ancient Chinese political and diplomatic thought.
Judging from his resume, how glamorous it is. In the lecture, he said: "If neither side is willing to give in once a war breaks out, then peace can only come immediately when one side completely admits defeat." He bluntly stated that surrender is actually the most effective means of achieving peace. ”
According to Professor Yan's logic, world peace can be achieved at any time, as long as one side in the war is willing to submit to the other and is willing to take that step, then peace will come.
This is really a ridiculous joke in the world, a university professor can sing such a tune in a big way, it is really the fearlessness of the ignorant.
Professor Yan said that the reason why many historical wars ended early and achieved peace was probably because one of the parties voluntarily chose to surrender and compromise. Therefore, he also cited two typical cases: the Sino-Japanese War and the Sino-British Opium War. Faced defeat in these two wars, the Qing government chose to surrender and sign an unequal treaty with China, a move that ended the war and opened a short-term period of peaceful transition.
This seems to be the same thing, but if war is all so simple, then is there still a need for war? Obviously, our Professor Yan completely ignored the crisis that the Qing Dynasty faced after the surrender, that is, even its own territory and sovereignty were ruthlessly damaged. Why did our motherland become a semi-colonial and semi-feudal society, why so many territories were occupied by invaders, and didn't Professor Yan see all these disasters?
Is it unbelievable that a university professor who does not even have the most basic common sense can make suggestions for the country in this way with state funds and projects?
From a personal point of view, which one of those who surrendered was recognized by the people? Shi Jingjiao surrendered the 16 prefectures of Yanyun, Zhao Gou and Qin Hui surrendered to the Jin State, Wu Sangui surrendered to Jin, and Wang Jingwei surrendered to Japan. Isn't there a warning meaning for these vivid examples?
Now the countries in the world that are at war are Ukraine and Russia, as well as Israel and Palestine. The people of these countries are suffering from the war, you tell your views to the governments and people of these countries, and you see who will be willing to accept your views, surrender, to admit defeat, can this be exchanged for peace?
One of the mottos of Tsinghua University: "Unremitting self-improvement, virtue". If the professors of Tsinghua University are all people like Professor Yan, then what hope does our nation have?
And this Professor Yan also sang another argument: "China does not need patriotic education, patriotism is not education." This is actually the same as the "surrender theory", which shows that this guy has dangerous tendencies in his bones.
Qian Weichang said: "For the prosperity and strength of the Chinese nation, I want to dedicate all my knowledge and wisdom." "If there is no patriotism, a country will be a mess, the people will only be selfish, and the country will have no future.
Why do our textbooks propagate Wei Qinghuo, Yue Fei, Wen Tianxiang, Yu Qian, Qi Jiguang, Zheng Chenggong, Lin Zexu, Zuo Zongtang, and revolutionary martyrs? Because they tell us that patriotism and dedication to the country can be vigorous and earth-shattering.
We promote them in order to promote patriotism, so that children can engrave patriotism in their hearts. When the country is facing danger, patriotic education can improve the cohesion and combat effectiveness of the people and jointly safeguard the interests and security of the country.
"The rise and fall of the world is the responsibility of the husband. "Only when each of us dares to sacrifice our country in the face of national peril, can our country and nation have hope, and surrender can only mean perdition—is there still a lesson of this kind of lesson?
A professor at Tsinghua University, a well-known expert, studied all his life, and finally came to such a conclusion, which I don't know what people should say about him - sad!
Dear readers, what do you have to say about the fact that Yan Xuetong, president of Tsinghua University, declared at the lecture that surrender is the fastest way to maintain peace?
[I am Butterfly Flower Rain Education, focusing on current affairs and the latest education trends, and I like to express my thoughts and thoughts in words. Friends who like me, please follow me: Butterfly Flower Rain Talk Education]