I thought that the perception that "the lower bunk belongs to a public seat during the day" was already outrageous, but I didn't expect that the "mother and daughter of the shop" in Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province still taught a lesson to the majority of netizens.
obviously bought the upper berth, but he rightly occupied the lower berth, either because he was old, or because he was sick and couldn't go up, and angrily scolded the conductor: That's your railroad problem.
However, when all the incidents were exposed, it was discovered that the problem was not the mother and daughter, but a third-party ticketing software.
So what's going on?Is it reasonable for third-party ticketing software to "take money and not do anything"?
According to a report by Xiaozheng Video on April 21, at around 5 a.m. on April 21, a mother and daughter occupied the lower bunk in Ganzhou, Jiangxi Province.
Originally, this time was the time when everyone slept soundly, but they were disturbed by the mother and daughter.
The reason is that a female passenger who got on the bus halfway, after getting on the bus, found that the position of her lower bunk was occupied, so she wanted to go back to her lower bunk, but she was rejected by the other party, and the reason given by the other party was that she spent the money on the lower bunk, and she was old and in poor health, so she had to sleep in the lower bunk.
Then the female passenger found the conductor, and after checking the tickets of both parties, she found that the lower berth was indeed the female passenger who came up later, and the mother and daughter were on the upper berth.
Loading...
And the reason why they slept in the lower berth was because they exchanged with another passenger with the help of another conductor, but this passenger's ticket was dropped off halfway, so this lower berth now belongs to this female passenger.
Although the female passenger and the conductor had figured things out, the mother and daughter were still reluctant to get out of the way.
His daughter thinks that she has spent dozens of yuan more on the third-party ticket-grabbing software, and this price is the same as the price of the lower bunk, so she thinks she has grabbed the lower bunk.
The mother thinks that no matter what ticket she grabbed, she spent the money on the lower bunk anyway, and she is old and in poor health, so she has to sleep in this lower bunk.
After learning their reasons, the conductor explained gently and patiently again: "This third-party software will deduct some fees, and will deduct a ticket grabbing fee, but you do buy the upper berth"
After finding out that it was a third-party software that didn't do anything, and she was wrong, her daughter felt that she was at a loss, and immediately threw her mother down and left.
And the mother did not let her come back, but wanted to show her medical records to prove that she was indeed old and sick.
But the female passenger also said that she had injured her waist and could not climb on the upper bunk, so she could not change the bunk.
After learning about the attitude of the female passenger, the conductor also made a suggestion, first let the lower berth out, and then sit in the next seat, and then help her coordinate when there is a lower berth later.
However, this suggestion was rejected by the old man, because she felt that she was either helping her or perfunctory, and said such an incomprehensible sentence:
"It's not my problem, it's your railroad problem"
After hearing this, the conductor was also confused, saying that it was difficult for her to communicate and not listen to people at all.
And after the incident fermented, netizens couldn't sit still:
"What do the police officers on the train do? Let them disturb everyone in the early hours of the morning?", "Isn't it very simple? Directly deal with it as a hegemon, this is the crime of disturbing public order"
"What other good way is this, I can only enter the blacklist, don't sell her tickets in the future", "This kind of thing has to be forcibly taken away, even the old man is not a reason to break the law"
"This pair of domineering mothers and daughters must be dealt with strictly, and at the same time, there are also problems with the railway, why should third-party platforms charge extra fees, and they can also be allowed to sell at a higher price"
"If I just don't change, don't say anything about the elderly and children advocating giving up seats, I have to call the shots when I buy a ticket, and I have no obligation to let it, if it is my elderly and children, either buy a bunk to sit on, or choose other means of transportation"
"It's really not disrespectful to the elderly, isn't this a moral kidnapping?
"This daughter is also funny, she ran away by herself when she saw the old man who ignored it", "Since you know that you can't go up, why do you want to buy it"
"In other words, they bought the ticket on a third-party software, paid for the lower berth but bought the upper berth, and then pretended to buy the lower berth, and after getting on the bus, they started to cheat, and then they started pretending to be stupid."
"The old man can take a video to expose the behavior of young people hanging curtains, why do young people still maintain the face of these unreasonable old people?"
"I know this, the third-party platform will deduct the handling fee, if you buy the lower shop on 12306 and replace it with the upper berth, you will refund the difference"
"The tone of the staff is really good, I really admire it", "It's because there are so many people like this, so young people slowly don't like to give up their seats"
In this case, is it reasonable for a third-party platform to use technology to grab tickets and sell them at a higher price?
In order to help users grab tickets, some third-party ticketing platforms have started to sell "gas packs" and let relatives and friends help them, saying that they can give priority to ticket purchases, which makes many users feel that this is a third-party platform using technology to snatch the tickets, and then sell them to users at a higher price through acceleration packages and other methods.
In response to this kind of question raised by users, 12306 also replied, saying that 12306 has never authorized any third-party ticketing software, if there is no ticket on the official website, then other platforms also have no tickets, even if the so-called refueling package is used, and the probability is the same as that that is not used, and they all need to be waitlisted.
In other words, the mother and daughter of the Zhongba shop in this incident bought a gas bag on a third-party ticket grabbing software, and then spent nearly the money of the lower bunk to grab an upper bunk, and the money for this refueling bag is not refundable, so they feel that they have spent the money of a lower bunk, so there is even more reason to stay in the lower bunk.
In the eyes of the mother and daughter, no matter where they bought the tickets, their money was given to 12306 anyway, so they were so justified, but for 12306, they never received the money, and they were not authorized to any third platform, so the money was collected by the third platform, but the probability of grabbing the ticket was the same.
So if this is really the case, then it is more reliable to go directly to the standby, otherwise you will not be able to buy the seat you want by spending more money.
So in this matter, the third-party ticketing platform is also to blame, but the main responsibility is still on the mother and daughter of the shop, obviously buying the upper berth ticket, but they want to occupy the lower berth, completely ignoring the rights and interests of others, and ignoring that people are also patients, this kind of arrogant and unreasonable approach, no wonder it will cause netizens to complain.
I only hope that the elderly in the future can be clear that whoever buys the ticket is whose position, and they have the right to do anything, and relying on the old to sell the old is no longer feasible.
What do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message to discuss!