There is a saying that public hospitals cannot be profit-oriented. This sounds so true that it is full of morality and justice. However, if we look closely, do we overlook something? Do medical personnel really not need to feed their families and live on spiritual food?
Imagine, if doctors and nurses really become angels who do not eat the fireworks of the world, then do they still need to worry about the mortgage, the children's tuition fees, and the medical expenses of the elderly? Can they still maintain the original intention of saving lives and helping the injured under the pressure of reality?
The term "angel" always gives people the impression of holiness and selflessness. In the field of medicine, we often compare medical staff to angels in white, because they use their professional knowledge and skills to save one dying life after another. However, angels also have times when they are tired, and angels also need to live.
When we shout "public hospitals can't be for profit", have we considered the living conditions of these medical staff? They are not real angels, they also need food, clothing, and housing. They also have families, parents to support, and children to educate. If we blindly emphasize the non-profit nature of public hospitals and ignore the actual needs of medical staff, will these "angels" continue to wave their wings and bring hope to patients?
Some people may say that medical personnel can choose other professions, so why do they have to become doctors and nurses, but the fact is that they chose this path not because they see the benefits in it, but out of reverence for life and love for medicine. They are willing to exchange their youth and enthusiasm for the health and smiles of their patients. Doesn't such a career choice deserve more respect and support?
Let's talk about financial support. If the government can provide sufficient financial support to public hospitals, so that medical staff can work with peace of mind and not worry about livelihoods, then the argument that public hospitals cannot be profit-oriented" will naturally hold water. However, the reality is that many places are under great financial pressure to provide sufficient financial support for public hospitals. As a result, medical staff have to compensate for the lack of income in other ways, such as overtime and part-time work. Under such circumstances, can we still blindly emphasize the non-profit nature of public hospitals?
Of course, we are not trying to justify the profit-making behavior of public hospitals, but to call on all sectors of society to look at this issue more rationally. Medical staff are the guardians of society, and their dedication and efforts should be duly rewarded. We cannot afford to enjoy the health and safety they bring and at the same time turn a blind eye to their survival.
On this issue, we need more understanding and support, not empty slogans and moral kidnapping. We need to realize that it is also possible for angelic wings to break due to the shackles of reality. Only when we truly understand and respect their career choices and dedication can the "angels" continue to wave their wings and contribute to the cause of human health.
Finally, I would like to ask: How do you see the contradiction between the living conditions of medical staff and the non-profit nature of public hospitals? How do you think we should solve this problem? Feel free to leave your views and opinions in the comment section. Let's cheer for the "angels" and jointly promote the healthy development of the medical industry!
Here, I would also like to say to all the medical staff who are sticking to the front line of medical care: thank you! Your dedication and efforts are the guarantee of our health and safety. Please continue to wave your wings and bring more hope and warmth to this world!