In the final analysis, involution is the uneven distribution of resources, and involution is not unique to Chinese, but we have just entered such a stage under internal and external troubles.
The Americans consume 35% of the resources with 6% of the world's population, and the other 94% of the population can only allocate 65% of the resources.
We can't look at China with the thinking of a small country, many times the tree wants to be quiet and the wind does not stop, the Sino-US game is not dominated by us, we only participate passively, because we also want to live a good life, we also want to have a matching position in the world, but if you want to develop, it will attract all kinds of suppression.
The West has written a script for us, that is, to honestly make shirts, shoes, toys, etc., and finally 700 million shirts for a Boeing, but we want to go our own way, we want to make mobile phones, chips, drones, big planes and other high-tech products.
You can do whatever you want, but the West will set up many obstacles for us, so what should we do? We have no first-mover advantage, and if we want to break the situation, we can only conquer one industry and then change the industry from a blue ocean to a red ocean, and take the route of good quality and low price.
This is the global trend, back to the country, involution is also an uneven distribution of resources, for example, 10 people average 100 yuan, each person can get 10 yuan, but if one of them takes 40 yuan, then there are fewer resources to participate in the distribution, which will intensify the competition, which is the source of involution.
It's not that we don't want to roll it, one is internal worries, one is external troubles, the solution to internal worries is to let as many resources as possible to participate in the distribution, rather than resources not to participate in the distribution or even to go abroad, external troubles are of course the Sino-US game, you take a step and people card you a step, you can only go a little bit of cannibalization, find an opportunity to overtake in the corner.
The West originally used carbon neutrality to suppress developing countries, but China developed photovoltaics, solar energy, and electric vehicles in one fell swoop, and as a result, people turned the tables upside down, and people said that we were too efficient and a threat to them.
Of course, it's okay not to roll in, just look at some African countries, if they don't roll, don't compare with Europe and the United States, after all, the first pot of gold was obtained by aggression and plunder, and China was the one that was plundered.
If China wants to develop, it can only rely on getting involved little by little in the international arena, and involution is not the best path for development, but if you look at the internal and external troubles mentioned above, which one is easy to solve? If it cannot be solved, it can only be rolled up, and the root cause is to break hegemonism and win the position it deserves.
Why is it that only China has achieved industrialization in so many developing countries in the world? It is not a gift from any country, nor is it the ability of a certain entrepreneur, it is the Chinese who have done it under pressure, and involution is the sign of this era and the only way for us to get rid of a century of humiliation.
When China's industrial manufacturing accounts for 50% of the world, when we get out of the Sino-US game, when we have a solid barrier, then maybe we don't need to roll.
Chinese have spent 40 years of development time, gone through the development of the West for a hundred years, naturally there will be various problems, China is also trying to solve, so there is no need to talk about the color change, this is a model, of course, we also hope to find a better development model as soon as possible, this is not overnight or a directive can be solved.