For the sake of the race, or for the sake of the project?
Terraces are not only an economic issue, but also a social issue. It has a bearing on the survival and happiness of the peasants and on the prosperity and stability of the country.
Five years ago, the state spent a lot of money to build the terraced fields, cut down trees and bulldoze hillsides.
What should have been exchanged was the prosperity of the countryside and the happiness of the peasants. But now, the terraces have become a no-man's land, and the peasants have become passers-by of the land.
Why is it that those who have the resources can squander them wantonly, and the farmers who really need them do not get the help they deserve?
And while these terraces are barren, why are new terraces being built, for whom are these terraces built, and where do their interests go?
In the face of such a reality, can we continue to be silent?
In this regard, netizens have heated discussions.
"Why don't you hold the people who approved the construction of this high-standard farmland legally responsible?"
"It is a great cause to tidy up the fertile land that has been abandoned in the country, and these rice trees are irresponsible messing up the mountain. ”
"This phenomenon exists in many places, the state has invested money, some engineering contractors have made money, and the farmers have not received any benefits, and they are still idle there, it is better to let the farmers plant something at will, and the state will not invest, and the farmers themselves can still get some profits. ”
"Only by engaging in engineering can there be oil and water, you fish, I fish, fatten a very small number of people, and in the end it is the country that will be pitted!"
Should we revisit our governance and regulatory mechanisms?
Establish a fairer and more transparent benefit distribution mechanism, so that farmers can truly benefit from the land.