The subsistence allowance has been implemented for many years, and the standard has been rising year by year, and the system is also improving at the same time. This is a good thing for the people in need. However, as an important part of the social security system, the original intention of the implementation of the subsistence allowance system is to ensure the basic livelihood of the people in need, and in recent years, negative news about the subsistence allowance has frequently appeared. For example, incidents such as "driving a BMW and eating subsistence allowance" and "misappropriation of subsistence allowance funds" have made the subsistence allowance lose its original meaning to a certain extent.
It is understood that in rural areas, the situation of subsistence allowance is more serious. Due to the relatively large number of needy groups in rural areas, while the mainland has continuously strengthened its assistance measures, villagers have also reported many problems in recent years. For example, the review of subsistence allowance recipients is not strict, resulting in the frequent occurrence of "relationship guarantee" and "favor guarantee". Another example is that the funds for the subsistence allowance have been misappropriated and have not benefited families in real need.
So, in urban and rural areas, what are the reasons for the gradual "taste" of the current subsistence allowance? Next, I will discuss this topic with you.
1. The subsistence allowance management system is not perfect. At present, the management system of the mainland's subsistence allowance system is not perfect, and there is a lack of a strict review mechanism and an effective supervision mechanism. This also makes some unqualified people obtain the qualification of the subsistence allowance through relationships, favors, etc., resulting in a waste of subsistence allowance resources. Even though a few people were cleared every year, it didn't take long for someone to take advantage of the loophole the following year.
2. The management of subsistence funds is not in place. There are indeed problems in the distribution and management of the distribution and use of the subsistence allowance funds, and in some places, the misappropriation of the subsistence allowance funds has led to the failure of the subsistence allowance funds to reach the families in real need. Some people tend to take advantage of their positions and profit from them, resulting in a large amount of money not being used.
3. Insufficient governance implementation. To be honest, the reason why the Subsistence Security will be exploited is that some areas do not implement the Subsistence Security policy enough. Even when it comes to governance, it is often not in-depth enough, which leads to frequent problems.
4. The influence of social atmosphere. In real life, there are also some undesirable tendencies in society, such as "fighting relationships" and "going through the back door", which have also had a certain impact on the subsistence allowance system. Some people take advantage of these unhealthy practices to obtain the eligibility for the subsistence allowance through improper means, resulting in an unfair distribution of subsistence allowance resources.
And just after the subsistence allowance gradually changed its taste, I believe everyone also heard such a voice, and some netizens also began to express their opinions on the Internet, saying that the subsistence allowance policy should be canceled and no more money should be wasted.
And this voice has been circulating on the Internet for many years, and there has been no result. But no matter what these people think, how they express themselves. Judging from the mainland's current social and economic development situation and the poverty base of the population, it is very difficult to cancel the eligibility for the subsistence allowance in a short period of time.
Because in the annual investigation work, there are constantly people in difficulty who are included in the scope of low-income population, including some who are eligible for subsistence allowance. Once the subsistence allowance is abolished and there is no subsidy, it will be bad for some people who have no labor force and no source of economic income, and if the basic living is not guaranteed, it will also affect the harmonious development of society.
In short, the original intention of the implementation of the subsistence allowance system was to ensure the basic living needs of the people in need, however, the current subsistence allowance has "changed taste" to a certain extent. The main reasons for this are the imperfect management system, the inadequate management of funds, the lack of implementation and the influence of social atmosphere.
If we want to solve the problem, we must also start from many aspects, such as improving the management system, strengthening the management of funds, intensifying implementation, and strengthening propaganda and education, so that we can effectively solve the problem of the "bad taste" of the subsistence allowance, return the subsistence allowance system to its original position, and give better play to the role of social security.
Okay, that's what I'm going to share with you, what do you think about it? Have you noticed? Let's talk about it.