What's going on?
Regardless of whether it is true or not, but combined with the rhetoric of Xiaochao's family and the hype of relevant articles in the media, how can you conclude that the "evidence presented in court" provided by Xiaochao has no water? Or rather, there is no lie?
If that's the case, what the drunkard said, if he hadn't lied, would Xiao Chao have possibly constituted the crime of intentional injury?
There is also Xiaochao who has learned sanda, a drunk has a brain herniation, no medical compensation, no one speaks, and he has to bear a bunch of infamy, just because he entered a school and molested a girl?
Of course, "Did you go to school and flirt with a girl?"
The little girl is still a student, her "violation" (school rules) ordering a takeout is nothing, it is also her own choice, she deserves to be caught by the school, but she didn't expect so many bad things to "order a takeout in violation of regulations". - In this incident, she chose not to speak out, or if she was good-looking, we couldn't spoil the future of others.
Having said that,
Is it possible for Xiao Chao to commit the crime of intentional injury?