#精品长文创作季#
China and the United States are now the world's two largest super economies, and in the past two years of development, China's economy has been more resilient and the momentum of development has been more fierce than that of the United States.
The international view also believes that China is likely to surpass the United States and become the world's largest economy in the future, which also makes the United States restless.
In order to maintain its world hegemony, the United States intends to restrict China's development, so the bilateral trade relations between the two countries have almost entered a stage of game.
In this regard, Argentine President Milley's recent remarks seem to indicate that he has made conditions to both China and the United States.
Whoever can help recover the Falklands, then who will Argentina side with, what is going on?
1. The question of the Falklands of Argentina
Most people don't know much about Argentina, and the only thing they know is football.
After all, in the 2022 World Cup, the Argentine team also won the World Cup, so it is well known.
So what kind of country is Argentina?
Overall, Argentina is the third-largest economy in Latin America.
The country is located in the southeast of South America, with a land area of 2,780,400 square kilometers and a population of more than 46 million.
Due to the uneven economic and industrial development of various regions of the country, the country's population is also mainly concentrated in the capital Buenos Aires and other cities surrounding the capital.
From an economic point of view, Argentina has a strong comprehensive national strength, a complete range of industries, and a well-developed agriculture and animal husbandry.
At present, the pillar industries in China mainly include steel, automobile and food processing, and also have certain advantages in the fields of chemical, petroleum and machinery.
However, the industrial base of Argentina's inland provinces is relatively weak, and the geographical distribution of industry is uneven, so the development speed of industry in the past two years has not been fast enough, and the vitality of economic development is low.
In the course of last year's development, the agro-industrial sector has been plagued by severe drought and rising inflation for a long time, as Argentina faces more complex environmental problems.
The overall economic development has also seen a certain decline, and according to the Argentine side, the total value of Argentina's domestic production in 2023 will shrink by about 1.6 percentage points compared with 2022.
Probably due to the unfavorable economic development, and the president of Argentina who was elected last year, Javier Millet, urgently needs to prove himself.
Therefore, he also intended to divert the attention of the people and once again raised the issue of the geopolitical dispute over the Falklands.
You must know that the Argentine people attach great importance to the Falklands issue, and this seems to have left an irreparable sore spot in their hearts.
Looking back at history, it is not difficult to find that the dispute over the Falklands of Argentina has a long history, involving the legacy of British colonialism and the fairness of international law.
Historically, the Falklands have been part of Argentina, but in the mid-18th century, the mighty British established colonies in the Falklands.
This behavior aroused strong dissatisfaction from the Argentine government, but because of Britain's strong national strength, the Argentine government really did not have a good idea to say anything.
However, in 1833, in order to better control the Falklands, Britain expelled local Argentine officials and began to administer the Falklands autonomously.
In order to be able to recover the Falklands, the Argentine government also intends to resolve the dispute through diplomatic means, especially at the beginning of the 20th century.
However, these efforts of the Argentine government did not have corresponding results, and the British government still recognized their sovereignty and rejected Argentina's demands again and again.
Under such circumstances, Argentina seems to have no other recourse than to resort to force in order to be able to recover the Falklands.
In 1982, the Falklands War broke out between Argentina and the United Kingdom, but this conflict ended in Argentina's defeat.
Subsequently, the two countries held many negotiations on the Falklands issue, but they never resolved the issue, and until now the Falklands issue is still British territory.
2. Milley put forward conditions to China and the United States at the same time
The Falklands issue has been around for a long time, and the current Argentine President Javier Milley is eager to resolve the Falklands issue and wants to get back the Falklands from Britain, but he is helpless.
Under such circumstances, Argentine President Javier Millet can only seek international help to resolve the Argentine Falklands issue.
Therefore, at the ceremony commemorating the 42nd anniversary of the Falklands War some time earlier this year, Milley promised that the government would put forward practical proposals on the Falklands issue in international organizations and forums, and once again hyped up the Falklands issue.
What is even more noteworthy is that when he faced the media, he seemed to intentionally or unconsciously prescribe conditions to the two major economies, China and the United States.
With regard to the United States, the Argentine president has put forward the relevant purpose of establishing a joint naval base with the United States.
It seems that they want to use this to suppress British rule over the Falklands, so that they can successfully recover the Falklands in the future.
As for China, Argentine President Milan claimed that if China can help in this regard, then the relevant trade between China and Argentina will be resumed.
It can be seen that Argentine President Milley has put forward relevant goals for the two super economies, China and the United States, in view of the current actual situation, so that these two countries can endorse Argentina's commitment to recover the Falklands and provide corresponding assistance.
I have to say that his behavior is indeed a bit crazy, but what makes us wonder is why he chose China and the United States?
In fact, this question is also very clear, after all, China and the United States are the world's two largest economies, and they also have a huge impact on the entire international market.
The United States is the world's number one scientific and technological power, and has the corresponding hegemony of the dollar, and has long maintained the corresponding position of the dominant power in the Western world.
Whether it is for the United Kingdom or the European Union, the United States seems to have a certain say.
According to previous experience, if these European countries do not converge with the relevant economic and trade policies and political decisions of the United States.
Then the United States will propose corresponding economic sanctions and create commodity trade barriers to restrict the market development of European countries.
With the help of the United States, Argentina was naturally able to put pressure on Britain so that it could successfully recover the Falklands in the future.
As for choosing China, it is also a very smart decision, after all, China's comprehensive strength has been increasing in the past two years, and for those Western countries, the influence of the Chinese market is also very obvious.
If Argentine President Milan can use forces other than Western countries to force Britain to submit, Argentina's influence at the international level will naturally be further highlighted.
What's more, when Javier Milley first took office, he had already severed relevant economic and trade cooperation with China, and such a policy made the Argentine market miserable.
It is impossible to obtain the Chinese market with low-cost and high-quality related products to meet the needs of the domestic market.
Under such circumstances, Milley is also anxious to resume trade exchanges with the Chinese side, and it is certainly the best choice to get in touch and communicate with the Chinese side through the Falklands issue.
3. The attitude of China and the United States
Argentine President Milley has certainly sent a corresponding signal to China and the United States, but what is the attitude of China and the United States?
As things stand, neither country has officially responded to this.
We don't know how the U.S. side thinks about it, but for our country, the follow-up decision must be very clear.
Our country will not exclude or refuse to engage in equal and friendly exchanges and cooperation with any country in the world.
With regard to the issue of Argentina's Falklands, the mainland's attitude has always been very clear, and it has expressed support for Argentina's relevant claims and demands.
After all, from an international perspective, Britain's occupation of the Falklands is indeed unreasonable.
However, it is worth noting that the severance of foreign trade relations between China and Argentina is actually the result of the decision of Argentine President Milley when he just took office.
If Argentina wants to gain China's support on the issue of recovering the Falklands, it may be a little insincere to simply propose the restoration of trade relations between China and Argentina.
Moreover, it is obviously unreasonable to put the issue of cooperation between the two countries and let China help Argentina achieve certain political goals, tying us to the chariot of resolving territorial disputes.
This is obviously a foreign policy of the mainland, and it will lead our country into unnecessary troubles in the territorial disputes of other countries.
The issue of territorial sovereignty itself is an internal affair of other countries, and the mainland has never interfered.
brief summary
Due to the unfavorable economic development, Argentine President Milley began to turn the attention of the people to the Falklands issue.
And in response to the settlement of the Falklands issue, it has sent a strong signal to China and the United States, which seems to indicate that whoever can help recover the Falklands will be in the same queue as Argentina.
I have to say that Argentine President Milley's behavior is extremely crazy, and this calculation is also extremely exquisite, but the plan he has hatched may be in vain.
Our country will certainly not interfere in the territorial sovereignty of other countries, and as for Argentine President Milley's desire to restore trade relations between China and Argentina, he will inevitably show corresponding sincerity in the subsequent development.
If the prediction is based on the corresponding historical experience, the United States may not support the relevant hospitals in Argentina, after all, the tangible and immediate benefits that the United States has obtained from them are not enough to make the United States aggressive.
So what do you think about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area below, communicate and discuss with the author, and finally don't forget to like and forward.
Resources:
Milley made conditions to China and the United States at the same time, and whoever helped recover the Falklands would be on Argentina's side
Hatps://m.163.com/d/article/IVP2j0g80552k3fb.html
Milley made conditions to China and the United States at the same time, and whoever helped recover the Falklands would be supported by Argentina
https://www.baidu.com/link?url=Q2M6DLK1aju3dompsptop0iwx07luxsputbbrlu3bidevi6ekimx0web9BFNI1oO6A&t=&EKIT=9E96652E0110A35D00000003661B0675