A few days ago, the news that 15 graduate students of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications collectively reported the female tutor attracted everyone's attention for a while. And these graduate students used a 23-page PDF report document to pull down the supervisor.
And in this news, there is a hot spot of concern, that is, the female tutor asked her graduate student to help her daughter complete the competition project. According to normal thinking, this is not an anti-aircraft gun to fight mosquitoes -- overkill? However, the reality is shocking, her daughter actually lost the competition, so that the female tutor was so angry that she accused the two graduate students: "I can't even do things well in junior high school!"
Let's take a look at this so-called "middle school student competition" science and technology innovation project, and it is not surprising that graduate students will fail to participate in this difficult competition.
Attentive netizens sorted out the "list of previous winners of the XX competition for primary and secondary school students in Haidian District sent by the female tutor to the graduate students".
Attentive netizens sorted out the "list of previous winners of the XX competition for primary and secondary school students in Haidian District sent by the female tutor to the graduate students".
This is still a junior high school student, and they have this kind of scientific research ability -- they have such a wide range of fields and such a deep degree of research, can this be done by a junior high school student? You know, the pressure on junior high school students is greater than that of a mountain, can they have so much time to do such a thing? Moreover, these studies can often take several years or more to complete, do they have that time? However, it is really unbelievable that such research can be selected and appear on the list of winners in a grand manner.
Since we have so many outstanding talents, why don't we let them go directly to graduate school, and why is it necessary to bury talents in this way? This kind of burying genius is too abnormal.
And some netizens sighed: "A single article can be used as my graduate thesis." ”
Is it true that middle school students have the ability to complete such high-level and professional scientific research? There is nothing wrong with publicizing the results of our education and teaching, but is it too eye-catching to do such a thing that goes against common sense? It really should, see through it and don't say it, do you know that I know?
However, such things seem to be commonplace now. No, recently, the final list of winners of the 39th Shanghai Youth Science and Technology Innovation Competition (referred to as the Shanghai Youth Innovation Competition) was announced, and some people found that some primary and secondary school students' award-winning works were very professional and seemed to have reached the level of master's graduation, and netizens expressed doubts.
And this time, it is even more exaggerated than before, these winners on the list, I am afraid that everyone who sees it will feel bent over, because taking out any one is not something that you and I ordinary people can understand, but they, these primary and secondary school students, can make us amazing research results.
When I look at such a list, I sometimes wonder what graduate and doctoral students we need to recruit now, and if we directly recruit these primary and middle school students into colleges and universities for training, will our scientific and technological level not advance by leaps and bounds? As long as so many geniuses are carefully cultivated, will they not be famous all over the world in time?
What is "a flexible wearable motion real-time analysis system for artificial intelligence", "a medical aid for the hearing-impaired based on hand key point technology", "a smart dispenser for Monte Carlo algorithm"...... No matter how you look at it, this should be a field and a professional term that only graduate students touch, but our geniuses can be caught at their fingertips - don't you admire the genius of our elementary and middle school students?
A blogger said that the first-prize winning project of the competition, "Monte Carlo Algorithm", turned out to be his professional question for the doctoral examination that year. Isn't this blogger a little sour, why did he say such a thing? What kind of era is it now, you have long been outdated, and today's primary and secondary school students have already surpassed several eras? You are still dreaming there, should you?
There is nothing surprising that some people joke about this as a proxy war. And the reason why the child of the female tutor of Beijing Post and Post lost the competition was because the graduate student's skills were not deep, which led to Waterloo.
Now, this kind of competition is basically "dancing with demons" and "all of them are power training". What is the value of holding such a competition? Is it just to train children to break faith and lie? It is very difficult to understand.
While it is important to cultivate the innovative spirit of primary and secondary school students, we should not put the cart before the horse. The true meaning of education is to teach students to be human beings, and honesty is a precious quality and a compulsory course in life.
We can't cheat for the sake of grades, let alone fake grades for the sake of higher education. What is the value of such a disgusting competition? Or is it very important to let the students try to return to the same starting line, and fair competition.
Dear readers, what do you want to say about the fact that the topic of the examination has appeared in the "Youth Innovation Competition"?
[I am Butterfly Flower Rain Education, focusing on current affairs and the latest education trends, and I like to express my thoughts and thoughts in words. Friends who like me, please follow me: Butterfly Flower Rain Talk Education]