In the fierce battle in the first round of the group stage of the U23 Asian Cup and the Olympic preliminaries, the Chinese Olympic team lost to the opponent Japan team and lost 0-1.
This game is not just a battle between winners and losers, but also a story that unfolds, so let's uncover the story behind it and evaluate the performance of the players.
In the first half of the game, the Japanese team took advantage of an oversight in the Chinese defense and seized the opportunity to take the lead.
However, this advantage did not last long, as a player of the Japanese team was sent off for a malicious foul and the situation of the Chinese team improved slightly.
Although China had the advantage of a Japanese player being sent off in the first half, they were unable to convert that advantage into a goal.
On the field, the Chinese team showed a certain amount of pressing, but they seemed to lack a targeted tactic to overcome the solid Japanese defence.
Netizens had mixed opinions on this, with some accusing the coaching staff of not preparing enough before the game, while others felt that the players lacked enough execution.
A netizen commented: Watching the Chinese team's offense is like watching a snail crawl, it's too slow! This straightforward and vivid metaphor reflects the inefficiency of the Chinese team on the offensive end.
The second half didn't go as expected.
Despite the tactical adjustments made by the coaching staff, it did not seem to be timely and reasonable enough.
The adjustment seems to have made Japan feel more comfortable, and they looked more comfortable on the defensive end.
Some netizens commented: The adjustment of the Chinese team is like changing the wheels, but the car has stalled! Although this analogy is a bit exaggerated, it shows the shortcomings of the Chinese team's tactical adjustment.
Towards the end of the game, the coaching staff's final adjustments also failed to work.
This made the Chinese team miss the opportunity to equalize.
Some netizens posted on social media that the final blow of the Chinese team was too soft, and it felt like a free send-off, but it was a pity! This kind of disappointment at the end of the game was widely circulated on the Internet, and people were quite disappointed with the performance of the Chinese team.
After the whole game, the online discussion continued to be hot.
Some blamed the players for a lack of fighting spirit, while others believed that the coaching staff was to blame for the defeat of the game.
A fan left a message on Weibo: "The Chinese team's performance today is really disappointing, and we expect them to do better!" Such expectations and appeals reflect the fans' expectations for the Chinese Olympic team, hoping that they can cheer up and achieve better results in future competitions.
Now, let's take a look at the performance of each of the players.
Baihram was excellent throughout the game, with excellent performances at both ends of the pitch and deserves an 8-point rating.
His hard work and dedication have been unanimously recognized by the fans.
A fan commented on social media: "Baihelam's performance today is really eye-catching, and his all-out efforts bring us a lot of hope! This kind of praise and support for Baihelam shows the fans' recognition and encouragement for him.
However, Eiffelding's performance was somewhat disappointing.
He failed to make a breakthrough and could only be rated as a 5.
Some netizens commented after the game: Eiffelding's state today is really poor, and his breakthrough ability has not been played at all! This criticism of Eiffelding's performance reflects the fans' expectations and disappointment with him.
Players such as Jia Feifei, Huang Zihao, Liang Shaowen, Duan Dezhi, and Liu Haofan performed steadily, but there was still room for improvement, and each received a 7-point evaluation.
They showed their quality and ability in the game, but also exposed some shortcomings.
One fan said on social media: "The performance of these players is not bad, but there are still some details to pay attention to, and I hope they can continue to improve in future games!
Zhu Yue, Jin Shunkai, Yang Zihao, Hu Hetao, Du Yuezheng, Xie Wenneng, Yu Jinyong and other players performed between 5 and 7 points, both good and bad, and need to be further improved.
These players had some bright spots in the game, but there were also some mistakes and shortcomings.
One fan commented on social media: "These players are doing okay, but they need to be more calm and decisive when it comes to key moments!"
Liu Junxian's performance was mediocre, and he was replaced in the second half, and he could only give a 5-point evaluation.
Some fans commented after the game: Liu Junxian's performance today is really disappointing, his performance is far from our expectations! This kind of criticism of Liu Junxian shows the fans' dissatisfaction and disappointment with him.
However, "Yangtze River Daily" gave him a high evaluation, and also showed delicate foot skills, and at the same time had a good overall view on the field, with the all-round attributes of being able to pass and shoot.
This evaluation gave a high affirmation to Liu Junxian's ability.
However, netizens have different opinions on this evaluation.
Some netizens believe that the evaluation of Liu Junxian by "Yangtze River Daily" is too exaggerated.
Someone commented on social media that Liu Junxian's performance was far from being 'extremely talented', and his performance in the game was not excellent.
Such comments reflect some netizens' doubts about Liu Junxian's actual performance, believing that he still needs to be improved.
Other netizens agreed with the Yangtze Daily's assessment.
They believe that Liu Junxian does have excellent talent and skills, but he just didn't play it out in this match.
A netizen left a message on Weibo saying: Liu Junxian does have strong potential, but he still needs more competition experience and training.
This optimism about Liu Junxian's potential shows the confidence and support of some netizens in him.
Other fans were more direct in pointing out Liu's lack of performance in the game.
A fan left a message on the team's official forum: Liu Junxian's speed is certainly fast, but his shooting accuracy and decision-making ability need to be improved, otherwise it will be difficult to step up at critical moments.
However, some netizens expressed concern about Liu Junxian's performance.
One fan posted on the forum that Liu Junxian's form has been unstable and he needs more opportunities and time to prove himself.
This concern about Liu's inconsistent performance reflects the uncertainty of some fans about his future development.
A spectator at the scene expressed some understanding of his performance, saying: Liu Junxian is indeed very young, it still needs time to mature and grow, and I hope he can improve in future competitions.
This understanding and encouragement of Liu Junxian reflects the support and expectation of the fans.
In the end, the Chinese Olympic team lost 0-1 to the Japanese team.
This defeat is regrettable, but it also gives us an opportunity to reflect and improve.
It is hoped that in the future competitions, the Chinese Olympic team can learn lessons, adjust tactics, improve the overall performance of the players, and win glory for the country.
If you have any ideas, please leave a message in the comment area below.
If there are problems in the article, please point them out, and the editor will try to correct them.
Note: It is not easy to be original, and plagiarism and manuscript washing must be held responsible. The picture comes from the Internet, and the infringement is deleted.