Recently, an incident of "college students fighting back against drunk people being detained" has sparked heated discussions on the Internet. The incident began when a female student was harassed by three drunk men while picking up takeaway at the school gate. Three male students came to dissuade them and got into an argument with the drunk. The drunk then forcibly broke into the school and got into a physical altercation with the male student, and a male student fought back, resulting in injuries to the drunk. The boy received a notice of criminal detention the next day.
After the incident was exposed, public opinion overwhelmingly criticized the police's practice of detaining college students, believing that their actions were justified defense. In the face of the pressure of online public opinion, the police set up a special team to intervene in the investigation and submitted it to the procuratorate for supervision. This development is seen as the police facing up to the demands of netizens and hoping to restore the truth.
But just when public opinion reached a consensus, a netizen who claimed to be a friend of the drunk man posted a post to break the news, saying that the information spread on the Internet was untrue, and the college student continued to beat the drunk man on the head after he fell to the ground, not knocking him down with a punch. This raises renewed doubts about the truth.
Whether it was the students who fought back in legitimate self-defense, or did the police really have a basis for determining that they had excessively injured others? What is the truth, it remains to be further investigated.
We will sort out the ins and outs of this matter in detail, analyze the remarks of all parties, and look at the attitude and enlightenment of this matter. It is hoped that through rational analysis, we call on all sectors to remain patient, wait for the results of the investigation, and not believe unsubstantiated rumors. It is also hoped that the police will announce the progress of the investigation as soon as possible, restore the truth and respond to social concerns.
What happened: The female student was harassed, and the male student dissuaded him and caused a physical altercation
On March 31, a female student at a university in Jinan was teased and harassed by three drunks while picking up takeaway. The three male students were dissuaded and got into a verbal altercation with the drunk. The drunk then forcibly climbed over the wall into the campus and got into a physical altercation with the male students, one of whom was choked by the neck and fought back, causing the drunk to fall to the ground and be injured.
The next day, the counterattack student was criminally detained by police on suspicion of intentional injury. The police determined that the incident was a mutual assault, and the two sides signed a settlement agreement that night. However, the injuries were more serious and the police charged them with intentional injury.
Public opinion questioned the police on one side, and the police set up a task force to respond
After the news spread, public opinion questioned the police approach. College students only defend themselves, and drunks are the first perpetrators of harassment and beating. The police have done the opposite, detaining students who have fought back is incomprehensible.
Public opinion even questioned the existence of black-box operations and unjust, false and wrongful cases by the police. The police's online comment area was also "besieged", demanding that the person be released and rehabilitated. In the face of pressure, the police simply responded that they would deal with it fairly, but failed to calm public opinion.
On April 12, the police announced the establishment of a special task force to intervene in the investigation and invited the procuratorate to supervise, marking the escalation of the case. This is seen as the police facing up to the demands of netizens, hoping to clarify the case and change the previous decision.
A drunk friend broke the news of the new fierce news, and the truth of the facts became suspicious
Just when public opinion reached a consensus, a netizen who claimed to be a friend of a drunk man posted that the information disseminated on the Internet was untrue. The student continued to beat the drunk man on the head after he fell to the ground, not a punch subdued. He believes that the police have video as proof and will not arrest people for no reason.
This revelation has once again raised questions about the truth. Whether the student's behavior was justified in self-defense? Whether the police determined that it was justified, and how the truth is still needed to be investigated and determined. This information has not been officially confirmed, and it may also be a justification for the drunkard's side.
Analyze the situation and its implications
To sum up, the situation in this case continues to develop, and the truth is not yet clear. But we can see:
Public opinion may have a one-sided tendency, and we should remain rational and objective, and not believe unconfirmed information.
The police should improve their ability to explain doubts, respond to social concerns in a timely manner, and prevent the spread of misinterpretation.
The involvement of the procuratorate in supervision helps to ensure that the investigation is fair and fair.
Further investigations are awaited to clarify responsibility.
We call on all sectors to be patient and rational and not to disseminate unverified information. It is also hoped that the police will announce the progress of the investigation as soon as possible, respond to social concerns, and uphold the authority of the law. Bringing the truth to light is a responsible approach to all involved.