Recently, a male student bravely stopped three drunk men from teasing female classmates on campus, only to be choked by one of the drunks, and he had to fight back to protect himself. However, this action actually caused the other party to fall to the ground, and the boy was later criminally detained on suspicion of intentional injury. The boy's father insisted that it was a legitimate defence. As soon as the incident was reported, it sparked widespread discussion and controversy.
Loading...
On the day of the incident, the boy witnessed three drunken men making verbal pranks and teasing of female classmates, and he did not hesitate to stand up and try to stop this inappropriate behavior. However, instead of listening to the dissuasion, one of the drunks grabbed the boy by the neck and threatened him not to interfere. In the face of unreasonableness and threats, the boy can only take action to protect himself, causing the drunk to fall to the ground.
Although the boy's actions were in legitimate self-defense to protect himself and his female classmates, it pushed him to the edge of the law. Based on the on-site investigation, the police determined that the boy's counterattack was suspected of intentional injury and had to be criminally detained. This decision has sparked many questions and questions, and all sectors of society have begun to debate the boundaries of legitimate defense and the fairness of the law.
The boy's father, as a person with a legal background, expressed his strong support for the incident, and his son's actions were justified in self-defense. He believed that the boy was facing threats and violence from a drunk man at the time, and that fighting back was only the only option to protect himself. He called on the law to pay more attention to the protection of individual rights and interests, and at the same time re-examine the handling of cases involving legitimate self-defense.
This incident has triggered in-depth thinking about legitimate defense from a legal point of view. On the one hand, we need to define the boundaries of legitimate defense more clearly and clearly to protect the legitimate rights and interests of individuals, and on the other hand, we need to focus on the importance of campus security and take measures to prevent similar incidents from happening. A fair legal environment and a safe campus atmosphere are the cornerstones of social stability and progress.
The trial and discussion of this case is ongoing. Regardless of the outcome, it is hoped that it will arouse more people's thinking and attention about legitimate defense, campus security, and legal justice. Only by being more open and fair