The first news when I woke up in the morning, "The boy injured and teased the drunken man who teased the female student and was criminally detained", I thought I was wrong, but I watched it again, and I read it correctly, it was the student who was criminally detained, and I suddenly found that it was very sad.
Molesting girls first, breaking into the school later, and then trying to hurt others, the three egregious illegal acts did not make the Jinan police uncle angry! This person is very good!
On April 13, according to Red Star News, an injury incident occurred in Jinan Electronic and Mechanical Engineering School in Shandong, causing a man to fall to the ground during the conflict!
What's going on?
On the evening of 31 March, when a female student in the Jinan Electronic and Mechanical Engineering School in Shandong Province was picking up takeaway at the door, three drunken men pretended to be takeaway brothers, and saw that a female student had come to pick up the food.
Loading...
After that, 3 drunk men did not take advantage, but they couldn't get angry, with the strength of alcohol, despite the dissuasion of the school guards and insisted on breaking into the school, one of the drunk men stepped forward and grabbed the neck of a male student Xiaochao, and the male student Xiaochao subconsciously waved a punch to the drunk man in self-defense, causing the drunk man to fall to the ground, and was sent to the hospital for treatment, which was diagnosed by the doctor as "brain herniation".
It is reported that the two parties also signed a settlement agreement at that time, when Xiao Chao thought that the matter was over here, but what he never expected was that on April 1, the police station found Xiao Chao with a criminal detention document in his hand and took Xiao Chao away.
The detention notice reads, "Criminal detention for the crime of intentional injury".
然而小超的父亲解释道：是醉酒男子先动手攻击的，小超在窒息的危险下，才出于本能反应才反击的。
Legal expert opinion: In the face of a potentially life-threatening attack such as a chokehold, the victim's counterattack when his or her life is threatened, in accordance with the law of justifiable defense.
However, after the video was released, netizens discussed that they were convicted of intentional injury in self-defense and counterattack.
According to Article 20 of the law, when you are harmed, you are justified in self-defense!
However, the police verdict is clearly contrary to the act of righteousness and courage.
In this way, who will step forward to stop such acts of picking quarrels and provoking troubles in the future? It not only involves campus safety, but also triggers a discussion on the boundary between legitimate defense and intentional harm.
Do you have anything to say about this? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area!