For your better reading and interactive experience, in order for you to see more content in time, click "Follow", we will update you with wonderful information every day!
Text/Catch entertainment in the sea
Editor/Catch entertainment in the sea
Last year's "Moving China" award ceremony can be described as a grand event that caused an uproar! The results of the selection of the top ten personalities aroused a collective "complaint" frenzy among netizens, like a storm of public opinion swept in, making social networks boiling.
People began to wonder what had gone wrong with the selection criteria. In this heated discussion, everyone had their own opinions and opinions, and there was a lot of controversy for a while.
Is there a problem with the judges' criteria? Or is it that the characters selected are difficult to identify? This series of questions makes the whole incident even more confusing, and makes people wonder: What went wrong with the selection criteria of "Moving China"?
Selection criteria: big PK
In this turmoil, the selection criteria have become the biggest focus of controversy, causing heated discussions and dissatisfaction among netizens.
They have pointed out that this year's selection seems to be skewed towards sports and entertainment figures, and lacks enough attention and recognition for the general population.
In their view, this trend is emotional, because the selected characters lack realism and empathy, and it is difficult to touch the inner world of ordinary people, let alone resonate widely.
Netizens believe that "Moving China" should pay more attention to the stories and contributions of ordinary people, rather than just focusing on well-known people in the sports and entertainment circles.
They believe that the truly touching stories often happen to ordinary people, and it is the dedication and persistence of those unsung heroes that are truly worthy of praise and praise.
Therefore, they are disappointed and dissatisfied with the characters selected this year, feeling that this goes against the original intention and purpose of "Moving China".
In addition, netizens also expressed doubts about the judges, believing that they may have been influenced by external factors, causing the selection results to deviate from the original track.
They hope that the judges will be able to carefully evaluate the contribution and touching level of each candidate, and not be blinded by the superficial aura, so as to better reflect the real social outlook and values.
Celebrity Adventures
When it comes to the selection list of "Moving China", one of the highlights is that an American appeared on the list, Mu Yanling.
Netizens complained one after another that this decision was simply worse, and it further aggravated the controversy and dissatisfaction of the entire selection incident.
Mu Yanling was selected as one of the top ten characters in "Moving China", which is really incredible.
Netizens couldn't help but wonder what the judges were thinking, aren't there enough touching stories in China?
This decision seems to be mocking China's own culture, which makes people feel a bit of "not succeeding in job hopping, coming to disrupt the situation".
Some people even joked that the judges were dazzled on the world map and turned China into the United States?
Mu Yanling's selection has caused a lot of doubts.
Netizens believe that this goes against the original intention and purpose of "Moving China", and also weakens the national characteristics and influence of this show to a certain extent.
Who was behind the manipulation that made a foreigner jump onto the stage of "Moving China"? This has become one of the hot topics of discussion.
The emergence of this decision makes the whole incident even more confusing.
Netizens began to question the fairness and professionalism of the selection, and their trust in the entire show was greatly reduced.
They hope that the organizers can explain this, return "Moving China" a clean slate, and also give an explanation to the audience.
The voice of netizens
In this storm of public opinion, the voices of netizens came like a tide, and they dissatisfiedly accused the judges of unreasonable selection criteria.
They believe that the judges may be blinded by the superficial aura and only focus on the popularity and achievements of the characters, ignoring the real emotions and stories behind them.
This kind of glittering selection method makes people feel a little disappointed and dissatisfied, as if what they see on the stage is only a glamorous shell on the outside, but they do not dig deep into the real emotion inside.
Some netizens even put forward the suggestion of "rather lack than abuse", thinking that if there is no candidate who meets the criteria, they should simply not be selected, and do not force ten places.
This attitude highlights the distrust and skepticism of netizens about the selection process, and they hope that the judges will be able to evaluate each candidate more carefully, without the interference of external factors, and truly appreciate their touching stories and the emotional value behind them.
The emergence of these voices makes the whole incident even more thought-provoking.
The reasonableness of the selection criteria has become the focus of discussion, and it has also triggered a reflection on the "Moving China" program itself.
People are starting to wonder what kind of story is really moving, is it the popularity and accomplishment, or is it the inner truth?
This discussion also made us realize that the fairness and transparency of the selection criteria are essential to maintaining the authority and credibility of the program.
The truth of the selection
Looking back on the past, most of the characters selected in the "Moving China" program have ordinary and real characteristics, and it is the true stories of these ordinary people that touch the heartstrings of the audience.
Their experiences are like a part of life, ordinary and real, but with infinite power and emotion.
For example, the touching old man Bai Fangli used his meager strength to help many poor students, and this selfless dedication is very moving.
However, in recent years, most of the characters selected by the "Moving China" program are celebrities who have achieved achievements in the sports and entertainment industry.
While their stories may inspire some, they struggle to reach a wider social group and resonate with more people.
The stories of these celebrities, while wonderful, often have a "different" temperament that is far removed from the lives and experiences of ordinary people.
As a result, many viewers find it difficult to find empathy in them, feeling that they seem to be somewhat disconnected from their own life circumstances.
This change has led to thinking and questioning about the selection criteria and program orientation.
They began to reflect on whether they should re-examine the selection criteria and pay more attention to those ordinary and real life stories, so that more ordinary people have the opportunity to become representatives of moving China.
This has also become one of the hot topics of discussion, and I hope that the future "Moving China" program can return to the original intention of being closer to life and touching people's hearts.
Conclusion: Re-examine the selection mechanism
This turmoil has not only aroused widespread concern and discussion in the society, but also prompted relevant parties to re-examine the selection mechanism.
Everyone hopes to select more representative and touching characters who can truly touch the hearts of the Chinese.
Controversy is the true meaning of "moving China"!
The above content is from the Internet, and the author of this article does not intend to target or insinuate any real country, political system, organization, race, or individual.
The above content does not mean that the author of this article agrees with the laws, rules, opinions, behaviors in the article and is responsible for the authenticity of the relevant information.
The author of this article is not responsible for any issues arising from the above or related issues, and does not assume any direct or indirect legal liability.
Note: It is not easy to be original, and plagiarism and manuscript washing will be studied deeply.
The picture comes from the Internet, if there is any infringement, please contact to delete.